I find all of this unconvincing. Why does any of this override the plausibility that Christians, who massively outnumber Jews globally by a factor of about 150-1, would similarly outnumber Jews among millionaires in the range of 10 to 1? In assessing information a lot of it is just going on what makes sense. Or are you suggesting Jews are really the 56% of global millionaires? Or higher than under 2%? Or higher than 10%? I'm just trying to understand what counter-take you have that I should accept instead of theirs.
CNBC called it non-partisan. I just parroted them. What does non-partisan mean? If they were run by Christians, and they may be at staff level or management apart from what you cited, would that mean they are biased because they cite Christians so high? No, non-partisan just means not politically aligned with a particular political party or similar.
The better approach is to ask if their findings are implausible. There are about 15 million Jews in the world. More or less. Well over a billion Christians. I'd find it pretty amazing if the numbers were much different that what they came up with. If anything I'm a little surprised Muslims are as low as they are.
You could easily have managed that just by reading the part that comes before millionaires:
According to a study from 2015, Christians hold the largest amount of wealth (55% of the total world wealth), followed by Muslims (5.8%), Hindus (3.3%), and Jews (1.1%)
Joe_McCarthy ago
The overrepresentation narrative is less interesting than that their lack of numbers just puts a serious ceiling on their clout.
Some old related discussion:
https://voat.co/v/OccidentalEnclave/3200912
Joe_McCarthy ago
I find all of this unconvincing. Why does any of this override the plausibility that Christians, who massively outnumber Jews globally by a factor of about 150-1, would similarly outnumber Jews among millionaires in the range of 10 to 1? In assessing information a lot of it is just going on what makes sense. Or are you suggesting Jews are really the 56% of global millionaires? Or higher than under 2%? Or higher than 10%? I'm just trying to understand what counter-take you have that I should accept instead of theirs.
OutlawCountry ago
Most Christians are Zionist Christians, therefore by proxy, fucking Jews, this shit gets all so tiresome.
Joe_McCarthy ago
CNBC called it non-partisan. I just parroted them. What does non-partisan mean? If they were run by Christians, and they may be at staff level or management apart from what you cited, would that mean they are biased because they cite Christians so high? No, non-partisan just means not politically aligned with a particular political party or similar.
Joe_McCarthy ago
You're just saying it's a Jew source and dismissing it. That's not an argument itself. But I have provided my own opinion for why it is believable.
Joe_McCarthy ago
The better approach is to ask if their findings are implausible. There are about 15 million Jews in the world. More or less. Well over a billion Christians. I'd find it pretty amazing if the numbers were much different that what they came up with. If anything I'm a little surprised Muslims are as low as they are.
Joe_McCarthy ago
Wiki, as is their wont, is merely quoting someone else. In this case a CNBC story:
https://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/14/the-religion-of-millionaires-.html
Which itself is quoting from the nonpartisan wealth research firm New World Wealth.
Lamp_shade ago
Cool story, joo boy. Now do one for billionaires and trillionaires.
Joe_McCarthy ago
You could easily have managed that just by reading the part that comes before millionaires:
According to a study from 2015, Christians hold the largest amount of wealth (55% of the total world wealth), followed by Muslims (5.8%), Hindus (3.3%), and Jews (1.1%)
Joe_McCarthy ago
Though I suppose some of those listed there as not religious are probably also Jews.
But at an absolute max we're probably looking at high single digits of the total.
Kinda underwhelming for total ZOG world domination.