You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

dooob ago

Great post, OP. @Vindicator what now? This clearly proves the image is not a deep fake photoshoped.

Sadly, this post will be slid. @srayzie

Vindicator ago

Well, photoshop did not play a big roll in my flairing the post in the first place...I was still waiting for a reply about how one proves or disproves something has or hasn't been photoshopped. The problem I have is headlines saying "Moloch Obama". Even if the pic is real, how can anyone prove this is actually Obama? The guy is wearing a mask.

dooob ago

What about the guy next to Obama?

https://kek.gg/i/5ktHnp.jpeg

Ignore the occultism part if it is not your cup of tea.

Vindicator ago

What about him? I'm not seeing your point.

dooob ago

Artur Davis... Least you could do was skim through the infographic I posted and you would see what my point was. Are you getting enough sleep?

Vindicator ago

Your infographic was impossible to read on either of my devices. How about just coming out and stating your point? If it's so straightforward, that should be easy to do in a few sentences, with links to the original sources of the supporting material.

dooob ago

Are you honestly telling me this infographic was so hard to read you couldnt spot Artur Davis? The infographic was taken from /qresearch/ notables, fyi.

Why are you so hostile towards me?

Crensch ago

He's not being hostile there, bud. He's asking you to state your point directly, and telling you that the image you provided doesn't work on his devices.

Both Vindicator and I want the source of the claims, but we also want the claims, which it seems you've not presented at this point in the conversation.

A question and then an infographic, even one the user can read, sometimes doesn't serve to communicate what you're wanting to communicate.

I think you both could use a breather, but I'm not going to tell you what to do.

@Vindicator