@Vindicator I'd like to ask that this be stickied.
SBBH troll basically confirmed that NOMOCHOMO is ESOTERICshade.
If successful pedophile shills have been manipulating users on this sub, I'd consider that far more relevant and sticky-worthy than most posts. The researchers themselves are under attack and under the spell of "mods bad" from these fucking pedo-protectors.
Nomochomo is still banned, and whatever alt he may be using is not attempting to undermine subverse moderation.
ES's account and reputation has been completely decimated, to the point where he is reduced to a bitter parody alt, the username of which will never seduce any user on this subverse, though I gave him his username flair just to pique him when he decided to try to ingratiate himself in my Wexner thread. I've thought about banning him, but the truth is, every time he shows up it just encourages the folks that pizzagate is real and Shareblue still cares about what we're researching here.
WOS hasn't been seen here in recent memory, perhaps because of the disastrous association with Kevdude and his grave error in doxing people. It's easy to show those two worked together from the very beginning of this subverse, so once Kev was exposed as a fraud, he has limited his scope.
I think you've beaten these turds so thoroughly that stickying this would give them power they've already lost.
One thing I might sticky, though, is an analysis of shill narratives, which you touched on but didn't fully develop. What specifically are they trying to convince people of? At what points in time (what else was in the news or being revealed by Q at the time)? To what end? When did they shift narratives? Of those who only comment -- which users or thread topics do they target? What do they ignore?
There are a number of folks here like @carmencita who have a habit of believing and supporting almost anything that comes across the board who I think inadvertently validate nefarious users who could benefit from that kind of analysis.
One thing I might sticky, though, is an analysis of shill narratives, which you touched on but didn't fully develop. What specifically are they trying to convince people of? At what points in time (what else was in the news or being revealed by Q at the time)? To what end? When did they shift narratives? Of those who only comment -- which users or thread topics do they target? What do they ignore?
view the rest of the comments →
Crensch ago
@Vindicator I'd like to ask that this be stickied.
SBBH troll basically confirmed that NOMOCHOMO is ESOTERICshade.
If successful pedophile shills have been manipulating users on this sub, I'd consider that far more relevant and sticky-worthy than most posts. The researchers themselves are under attack and under the spell of "mods bad" from these fucking pedo-protectors.
Vindicator ago
Nomochomo is still banned, and whatever alt he may be using is not attempting to undermine subverse moderation.
ES's account and reputation has been completely decimated, to the point where he is reduced to a bitter parody alt, the username of which will never seduce any user on this subverse, though I gave him his username flair just to pique him when he decided to try to ingratiate himself in my Wexner thread. I've thought about banning him, but the truth is, every time he shows up it just encourages the folks that pizzagate is real and Shareblue still cares about what we're researching here.
WOS hasn't been seen here in recent memory, perhaps because of the disastrous association with Kevdude and his grave error in doxing people. It's easy to show those two worked together from the very beginning of this subverse, so once Kev was exposed as a fraud, he has limited his scope.
I think you've beaten these turds so thoroughly that stickying this would give them power they've already lost.
One thing I might sticky, though, is an analysis of shill narratives, which you touched on but didn't fully develop. What specifically are they trying to convince people of? At what points in time (what else was in the news or being revealed by Q at the time)? To what end? When did they shift narratives? Of those who only comment -- which users or thread topics do they target? What do they ignore?
There are a number of folks here like @carmencita who have a habit of believing and supporting almost anything that comes across the board who I think inadvertently validate nefarious users who could benefit from that kind of analysis.
argosciv ago
/cough