Page 2 of 2

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2022 10:29 pm
by shewhomustbeobeyed
Heebro wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 7:59 pm So... true or not true?
Why don't you ask KKWW, or @Vindicator, or the guy in the doxx? Why are you asking us?

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 2:38 pm
by Heebro
Wouldn't this be the place to ask Vindicator? It doesn't look like the Bill in the Voat post is the same Bill that is Vin. Correct name. Wrong Bill. I couldn't tell if the Bill from the Voat post was even a real person. The details in the articles must be somewhat wrong but still not same Bill.

If I'm asking Vin then I'm asking, 'They got the wrong Bill, right?'

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:00 pm
by shewhomustbeobeyed
Heebro wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 2:38 pm Wouldn't this be the place to ask Vindicator? It doesn't look like the Bill in the Voat post is the same Bill that is Vin. Correct name. Wrong Bill. I couldn't tell if the Bill from the Voat post was even a real person. The details in the articles must be somewhat wrong but still not same Bill.

If I'm asking Vin then I'm asking, 'They got the wrong Bill, right?'
So you've come here to ask the mod of this subforum to confirm or deny that doxx? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
You're funny!

If Vin didn't confirm/deny on old voat, what makes you think it's going to happen now?
Good luck with your inquiry. @Vindicator doesn't seem to hang around here anymore.

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:33 pm
by Savesequim
shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:49 pm @Savesequim What's your point?
I thought it was necessary context as you accurately pointed out that the reddit OP didn't provide any proof.

Given that the name was posted in Pizzagate, and @Vindicator interpretted it as a dox attempt against him, I understand why @Heebro originally posted it here.

Now this begs the quesion. Was @PizzaGates opaquely attempting a dox? Or did vin overreact (and indirectly confirm his own identity)?

Reading pizzagates original post, it appears to me they weren't accusing vin of being Haney, but noted the coincidence. The twitter/vimeo accts in question (Vindic8) don't appear to be the same Haney referenced in the text of the post.

Moreover, I doubt the moderator of pizzagate would use a similar username to his personal usernames on other platforms...but dumber things have happened.

P.S. if this was a dox, why was it allowed to stay on the platform? Was that allowed on Voat? is it allowed on Searchvoat?

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:39 pm
by Deleted User 2149
Oh look, the concern troll has shown up again.

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 3:42 am
by Savesequim
shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:00 pm
Heebro wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 2:38 pm Wouldn't this be the place to ask Vindicator? It doesn't look like the Bill in the Voat post is the same Bill that is Vin. Correct name. Wrong Bill. I couldn't tell if the Bill from the Voat post was even a real person. The details in the articles must be somewhat wrong but still not same Bill.

If I'm asking Vin then I'm asking, 'They got the wrong Bill, right?'
So you've come here to ask the mod of this subforum to confirm or deny that doxx? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
You're funny!

If Vin didn't confirm/deny on old voat, what makes you think it's going to happen now?
Good luck with your inquiry. @Vindicator doesn't seem to hang around here anymore.
My question is how @SearchVoat deals with these kinds of quandaries (what constitutes a dox). If a user shares a username across platforms and has their name tied to it, is that a dox?

If the dox was already posted to Voat, is it grandfathered in?

If the user is no longer active, are doxxes allowed? I would like to follow up on this thread by either confirming or denying the information alleged, but don't want to break any rules.