Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Investigating corruption, child trafficking and abuse uncovered in the WikiLeaks Podesta emails.

Moderators: Heisenberg123, Vindicator, EricKaliberhall, darkknight111

User avatar
Heebro
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 2
Reply points (CCP): -1

Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by Heebro »

How true is this summary about Voat and Q?

https://old.reddit.com/r/ConspiracyDisc ... t_hard_to/
On Voat, which shut down to prevent Hunter Biden data from spreading, the Q astroturfing movement on Voat was managed by shills like Bill Haney and Suzanne Ayson, who was sharing nude photos of herself to other moderators (like Bill... does his wife know?) to inculcate multiple sub groups in her favor, and in Q’s favor. This resulted in a lot of “alt right” moderators censoring alt right content, including the origins of Q and the leaked Hunter Biden data, which was completely ignored by the Q movement and is still being ignored by the Q movement.

Off of Voat, it seems that a small group, in 2016, had plans to use "IamQ" as a kind of platform/brand to reveal information on corruption, particularly around the child trafficking. Pamphlet Anon and Crew, then, co-opted the whole idea and used other people's research to actually be Q posters. The intelligence realm entered the equation and moved Q posters onto 8chan, now 8kun, mainly because it was one of the most nefarious places on the Internet with child porn being rampant. The idea that people against CP would use a notorious CP board was suspicious, to say the least.

I believe it was a wakeful moment for many users of Voat when Pizzagate information was being censored by influencers within the Q movement. Drama was inserted into “research’ subreddits to derail them and splinter the research groups. "Strategy of Tension." "Organizational Paradoxes."

Gamergate was a similar version of this, where feminine wiles were used to compromise and bias journalists that operated in the gaming realm. While users were painted as “alt right” extremists, the truth is that they took offense when supposedly trustworthy sources of information had turned dishonest over promises of sex.

Many news outlets reported on Watkins and the people involved in 8chan’s involvement with the Q movement, but we have video evidence that Coleman Rogers aka “Pamphlet Anon” was the person originating the posts, themselves; that the Q movement had no inside information and was exploiting the work of crowd sourced research from average Internet users; and that the astroturfers on both sides of political issues, with the help of Big Tech, protected the Q movement puppet masters from exposure.
User avatar
shewhomustbeobeyed
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 246
Reply points (CCP): 2041

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by shewhomustbeobeyed »

So you only show up to stir shit? WTF???
How true is this summary about Voat and Q?
It's just an opinion, s/he posts no supporting links for that section, like in the rest of the post.

I don't know if that reddit poster is the same KKWW that started PG on old voat. But if it is, s/he's got a lot of nerve posting shit after abandoning PG.
We all know that sQuirty's a whore, and some men of voat cucked for her and Q.
Why don't you post this in v/GA? It's where it belongs.
User avatar
Heisenberg123
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 433
Reply points (CCP): 926

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by Heisenberg123 »

They posted their own surveillance pictures - implicates they are likely coming from US intelligence network.

Other than that its hard to tell. Its even hard to tell if it was same group of people behind all posts, but for sure lots of surveillance pics were posted especially 2018.

There were also many nefarious players using this movement just like it was with 2016 November reveal... Many trying to point you in direction on who is Q or who he is not.

I would suggest to bypass Q reference and focus on research/citizen investigation. Info alone will prove us right.
Savesequim
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 2:58 am
Topic points (SCP): 9
Reply points (CCP): 6

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by Savesequim »

shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:55 pm So you only show up to stir shit? WTF???
How true is this summary about Voat and Q?
It's just an opinion, s/he posts no supporting links for that section, like in the rest of the post.

I don't know if that reddit poster is the same KKWW that started PG on old voat. But if it is, s/he's got a lot of nerve posting shit after abandoning PG.
We all know that sQuirty's a whore, and some men of voat cucked for her and Q.
Why don't you post this in v/GA? It's where it belongs.
Looking at searchvoat, Bill Haney was brought up once before in the pizzagate sub

https://searchvoat.co/v/pizzagate/3729376

@PizzaGates (the poster) was banned for "attempted doxxing" by @Vindicator who cited the post as the ban reason and highlighted the name in question.

https://searchvoat.co/v/pizzagate/3837970/23978061
Deleted User 2149

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by Deleted User 2149 »

Look everyone, the concern troll has resurfaced.
User avatar
shewhomustbeobeyed
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 246
Reply points (CCP): 2041

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by shewhomustbeobeyed »

@Savesequim What's your point?
User avatar
TFS
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 3344
Reply points (CCP): 3764

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by TFS »

CognitiveDissident5 wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 9:10 am Look everyone, the concern troll has resurfaced.


It loves to bring negative attention to the existence of this place. The glowniggers' best friend, I'm sure we've all been reported to the five eyes anti free speech department by now. Fuck this smug, self congratulatory little cunt!
User avatar
shewhomustbeobeyed
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 246
Reply points (CCP): 2041

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by shewhomustbeobeyed »

TFS wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:03 pm I'm sure we've all been reported to the five eyes anti free speech department by now. Fuck this smug, self congratulatory little cunt!
Wait! I thought we all got flagged four to six years ago, on old voat. If I'd have known it took this long, I would have stepped up my game. :lol:

FUCK ALL FEDS! :twisted:
User avatar
TFS
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 3344
Reply points (CCP): 3764

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by TFS »

shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:16 pm
TFS wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:03 pm I'm sure we've all been reported to the five eyes anti free speech department by now. Fuck this smug, self congratulatory little cunt!
Wait! I thought we all got flagged four to six years ago, on old voat. If I'd have known it took this long, I would have stepped up my game. :lol:

FUCK ALL FEDS! :twisted:

You're late in the game then, I got flagged when I was eight...the first time :lol:

Seriously, it's a matter of principals though. Some people have them, some are rats.
User avatar
Heebro
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 2
Reply points (CCP): -1

Re: Conspiracy Discussions and the mention of Voat.

Post by Heebro »

So... true or not true?
Post Reply