He'll probably come back with a link to "science shows we should all socialize through videochat", "no difference between virtual and real socializing, experts say"
Proof?
-
TheRealSkeptic5000
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:19 pm
- Topic points (SCP): 408
- Reply points (CCP): 223
Proof?
He'll probably come back with a link to "science shows we should all socialize through videochat", "no difference between virtual and real socializing, experts say"
-
MrPim
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 87
- Reply points (CCP): 122
Re: Proof?
Online socialization means I can only wish death upon niggerfaggotkiketards.
-
TheGreatWhiteHope
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 84
- Reply points (CCP): 291
Re: Proof?
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
-
TheRealSkeptic5000
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:19 pm
- Topic points (SCP): 408
- Reply points (CCP): 223
Re: Proof?
Yikes.
oh sweet summer child, who hurt you? alright let's unpack.
This. so much this.
-
2017Fallout
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 4
- Reply points (CCP): 261
Re: Proof?
This is a thing of beauty. Thank youTheGreatWhiteHope wrote: ↑Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:41 pm Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.