SearchVoat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:15 am
papaD wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:10 am
heres the misdirect
Here's the point:
SearchVoat wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:28 pm
I need to design rules that can be enforced without reference to personal point of view. Every rule in the world has edge cases that almost everyone will disapprove of. But it is more valuable to have a rule which is rigid and clear, than to have one which is open to personal interpretation by whomever happens to be in charge today.
That's why I'm putting so much thought into this. I'm not trying to win.
What are your boundaries, i.e. edge cases? Do you have any and are you the best person to decide (nevermind that you are in the position to be the only person to decide)?
Is it permitted for people to be posting grooming advice for their pedo friends on how to successfully molest children?
Is it permitted for pedos to share cp links/websites with or without secret passwords?
If someone is a convicted child rapist, and it's discovered that they are on this site bragging about it, can they be called out by name if their identity is public record and people figure out that it's them?
Is it permitted for pedos to discuss personal details including name and location, photos of children they want to molest or have molested? Are they protected by SVF privacy rule in the pedo playground subs?