lolie pedo sub request

[SearchVoat]

I'm clearly playing catch up on current events, (didn't know about the text stories etc. 'all that kind of stuff'. I got the drift on the dox debate I think. But what is the latest requested sub exactly?

Here's the request, and here's the sub.

[SearchVoat]

This right here:

It's US legal, so by my rule it's permitted here

is what makes you a lying hypocritical scum bag. You know what else is US legal?

Sharing personal information voluntarily uploaded to the internet.

Ok, good point. Not everything that is US legal is permitted here. But I'm pretty sure sharing personal information, however acquired, is US legal too, so why any rules against doxxing at all?

[Thisismyaccount]

Recently on talk.lol system put tags on stuff such as porn and the markryden subs. They are default blocked now and users have to unblock them manually. I suggest @SearchVoat institute this same measure. We all know what stuff he is willing and able to post just to get people riled up myself included. As I have said before, it's what he does and all he does. Block his sub and let individual users unblock it. 1 ounce of prevention is worth more than 1 lb of cure. One incident with him was the postop tranny crotch shots and the senior's porn he posted. It takes a warped sick mind to hunt stuff like that down and post it on the front page for everyone to see. This is what he is capable of and quite willing to do. Please think about this @SearchVoat. I would prefer him not being on this site all together, but he is and you need to keep in check at all times. Either that or give users the block button to use so we won't see what he's posting. To be truthful I do NOT trust him.

[antiliberalsociety]

This right here:

It's US legal, so by my rule it's permitted here

is what makes you a lying hypocritical scum bag. You know what else is US legal?

Sharing personal information voluntarily uploaded to the internet.

Ok, good point. Not everything that is US legal is permitted here. But I'm pretty sure sharing personal information, however acquired, is US legal too, so why any rules against doxxing at all?

If it's acquired through hacking or breaching data privacy (IE what @The_Venerable did to @fightknightHERO the kike that he is) then it should be disallowed. But the second they spill their own shit - it's on them. Just like your details are on you.

Your panic induced censorship didn't help your cause. You've lost all credibility and are no better than talk.loli now.

[papaD]

[/quote]

If it's acquired through hacking or breaching data privacy (IE what @The_Venerable did to @fightknightHERO the kike that he is) then it should be disallowed. But the second they spill their own shit - it's on them. Just like your details are on you.

Your panic induced censorship didn't help your cause. You've lost all credibility and are no better than talk.loli now.
[/quote]

good luck getting that one through their head. these pedos are dense as fuck. misdirect inc

[SearchVoat]

Recently on talk.lol system put tags on stuff such as porn and the markryden subs. They are default blocked now and users have to unblock them manually. I suggest @SearchVoat institute this same measure. We all know what stuff he is willing and able to post just to get people riled up myself included. As I have said before, it's what he does and all he does. Block his sub and let individual users unblock it. 1 ounce of prevention is worth more than 1 lb of cure. One incident with him was the postop tranny crotch shots and the senior's porn he posted. It takes a warped sick mind to hunt stuff like that down and post it on the front page for everyone to see. This is what he is capable of and quite willing to do. Please think about this @SearchVoat. I would prefer him not being on this site all together, but he is and you need to keep in check at all times. Either that or give users the block button to use so we won't see what he's posting. To be truthful I do NOT trust him.

That facility has always been available here. From the ToS:

4. Some kinds of content may not be posted outside forums tagged appropriately:
* Nudity: Adult nudity, pornography.
* Gore: Gore, blood, violent death.
* Pedo: Sexually suggestive material involving minors.
* Free speech: Racism, sexism, anti-semitism etc.

You can set visibility in your control panel.

[SearchVoat]

If it's acquired through hacking or breaching data privacy (IE what @The_Venerable did to @fightknightHERO the kike that he is) then it should be disallowed. But the second they spill their own shit - it's on them. Just like your details are on you.

Your argument is persuasive. Let me think about that.

[antiliberalsociety]

You're a bit too late for that. Anyone who stays here after what you did will lose credibility right along with you. I've destroyed people's arguments on ConsumeProduct with the simple fact that they frequent talk.loli. Anyone who asks I show them proof of what it stands for. They may be a bunch of plebbit tier mods, but at least there they have a no porn rule.

You did the same thing. You dropped your mask.

[SearchVoat]

If it's acquired through hacking or breaching data privacy (IE what @The_Venerable did to @fightknightHERO the kike that he is) then it should be disallowed. But the second they spill their own shit - it's on them. Just like your details are on you.

Your argument is persuasive. Let me think about that.

Hmm where to draw the line. What if I just have poor opsec? What if I post a picture of my backyard and some 4chan autist locates it like they did Shia LeBoeuf's flag? Still thinking...

[papaD]

If it's acquired through hacking or breaching data privacy (IE what @The_Venerable did to @fightknightHERO the kike that he is) then it should be disallowed. But the second they spill their own shit - it's on them. Just like your details are on you.

Your argument is persuasive. Let me think about that.

Hmm where to draw the line. What if I just have poor opsec? What if I post a picture of my backyard and some 4chan autist locates it like they did Shia LeBoeuf's flag? Still thinking...

heres the misdirect