Dox drama

[antiliberalsociety]

ahem*

Is all we needed to see. You deleted my comment but forgot you quoted it. I can't wait to hear about this on the next podcast.

I don't know which comment you say I deleted, this one? viewtopic.php?p=29570#p29570

No, the original comment of mine in the chat - the one you quoted.

[antiliberalsociety]

As far as I know, my IRL identity has not been exposed. AFAIK, the information available about me includes the fact that I have been suicidal (in the past; very far away from that place now Thank God) and that I live in NSW, Australia. If there's anything out there that identifies me in any other way I would appreciate it if you sent me a PM about it.

You didn't answer the question. Are you afraid of related details you yourself put out there coming back to bite you?

Oh yes, sure. There are people who know me IRL who know I run SV. The dumbass stuff I posted a few weeks back has and will definitely cause me problems. But what does that have to do with doxing?

Your custom definition of the term Dox. You moved the goalposts pretty far and threatened the whole userbase with it. It looks suspiciously like you're just trying to cover your own ass regarding your child abuse confession.

[antiliberalsociety]

Don't care about his dox. Never did.
And you're still a filthy fucking doxxer. Who lies, and makes shit up about people.

Answer my questions if you're so high and mighty.

There is no question posted. But i will not answer you're Qs. You try to glow too much.

There was in the "Doxxing Hojoruku" thread:

Look at what you're siding with:
You wouldn't be the first woman I've known to turn a blind eye to child rape.

Pay attention everyone. This right here is why ALS is such a fantastic piece of shit.
When someone calls out his bad behavior, he makes up lies about them.
Every. Single. Time.

What's the lie? I quoted actual comments. He legit said he'd scuttle this site for the pedophile that you supposedly hate. And you're blindly backing that. You picked your side. What good is bitching about his pedo shit when you ignore the authoritarian enforcement of it. Seriously, what's the logic to that?

viewtopic.php?p=29655#p29655

[SearchVoat]

Is all we needed to see. You deleted my comment but forgot you quoted it. I can't wait to hear about this on the next podcast.

I don't know which comment you say I deleted, this one? viewtopic.php?p=29570#p29570

No, the original comment of mine in the chat - the one you quoted.

I deleted a couple of messages in chat because they doxed a user. I don't recall quoting one but I may be mistaken. Unfortunately (unlike posts) chat messages can't be soft-deleted, so they've gone for good. Unless you have a screenshot? inb4 "very convenient"

[SearchVoat]

You didn't answer the question. Are you afraid of related details you yourself put out there coming back to bite you?

Oh yes, sure. There are people who know me IRL who know I run SV. The dumbass stuff I posted a few weeks back has and will definitely cause me problems. But what does that have to do with doxing?

Your custom definition of the term Dox. You moved the goalposts pretty far and threatened the whole userbase with it. It looks suspiciously like you're just trying to cover your own ass regarding your child abuse confession.

1. The definition of dox, here and elsewhere, forever, has been "identifying information". There was none, as far as I remember, in those posts. No moving of goalposts.

2. What child abuse confession?

[antiliberalsociety]

I don't know which comment you say I deleted, this one? viewtopic.php?p=29570#p29570

No, the original comment of mine in the chat - the one you quoted.

I deleted a couple of messages in chat because they doxed a user. I don't recall quoting one but I may be mistaken. Unfortunately (unlike posts) chat messages can't be soft-deleted, so they've gone for good. Unless you have a screenshot? inb4 "very convenient"

Who needs a screenshot when you quoted the very comment that was deleted? There was no dox, this is you protecting a very famous pedophile from the Voat community. "I just didn't notice till nao" - now THAT is very convenient...

[antiliberalsociety]

Oh yes, sure. There are people who know me IRL who know I run SV. The dumbass stuff I posted a few weeks back has and will definitely cause me problems. But what does that have to do with doxing?

Your custom definition of the term Dox. You moved the goalposts pretty far and threatened the whole userbase with it. It looks suspiciously like you're just trying to cover your own ass regarding your child abuse confession.

1. The definition of dox, here and elsewhere, forever, has been "identifying information". There was none, as far as I remember, in those posts. No moving of goalposts.

2. What child abuse confession?

1. Your definition omits the part where personal information VOLUNTARILY UPLOADED TO THE INTERNET becomes public domain.

2. You know damn well what I'm talking about, you deleted it from the chat. The perfectly legal screenshot taken of your own confession post.

]antiliberalsociety • Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:11 pm
Oh look, bannable material...
User avatar
antiliberalsociety • Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:10 pm
Oh, look who's sub he decided to bless with his confession. Was it v/confessions?

Image

Do you really want to go there? I can post the link again, or is this a ban trap?

[SearchVoat]

Ok, I get it. Sorry for being slow, didn't know which message you were referring to.

Yes I deleted that screenshot for purely selfish reasons. No "rule" basis, nothing to do with doxing. I just don't want it falling into the wrong hands atm. You're perfectly entitled to post it, but I'd ask you as a favour not to. If you do, I'll probably delete it again. Can't justify it other than to say I'm in enough shit already and that post could cause me more.

Edit: more than happy to discuss it as much as you like, just please don't post it or link to it. Discuss in PM if you prefer.

[antiliberalsociety]

Ok, I get it. Sorry for being slow, didn't know which message you were referring to.

Yes I deleted that screenshot for purely selfish reasons. No "rule" basis, nothing to do with doxing. I just don't want it falling into the wrong hands atm. You're perfectly entitled to post it, but I'd ask you as a favour not to. If you do, I'll probably delete it again. Can't justify it other than to say I'm in enough shit already and that post could cause me more.

That is not a favor, that is a threat. This is precisely why we think your moving the goal posts is selfishly motivated. You've shown your hand, we know what you hold.

What difference does it make at this point? You've already pissed away your entire life, you turned on the last remnants of the greatest free speech website around, and now you're resorting to censorship. It boils down to this:

Did you act honorably? Or did you act in your own self interest?

You admitted you'll scuttle this site for your own petty reasons, and those reasons were protecting the pedophile. This is not consistent with your demeanor thus far, it's rather abrupt. This indicates something happened and you were forced to act quickly. Now you're saying you're "in enough shit already" yet you're allowing the pedophile to roam free? Even protecting him from trolls (of which he's no stranger to dishing out himself) and your allegiance is now publicly visible.

So yes - I am forced to compare it to your confession in which you said your wife accused you of abusing your boys. So protecting the pedophile is a priority, but not upholding the free speech model that was the very essence of Voat, which is why you still have a userbase (or had). You're taking unfair shots at the userbase, threats of blanket bans of anyone that breaks your self interpreted rule, a very emotionally charged vow to make sure they "never come back again", and you're willing to shoah your entire site for it? Yeah, no. That doesn't pass any smell test. It's quite evident you've pulled some dirty shit in the past and you're deathly afraid it'll catch up to you even on here.

Your priorities are fucked. There's no denying that. But I come from a background of "get to the truth" because where there's smoke, there's fire. And you are NOT looking good right now. I will say this, you have demons in your closet trying to get out. It would behoove you to just go the way you went before and let this shit go, because karma can be a bitch as we've seen. BUT - after what you did, and are doing, it's too late. So you might as well pull a full on "system" and ban dissenters. Ban anyone that "insults" or "accuses" you of anything you don't like. But I will say this - despite his pissing away 75% of authentic users, you STILL don't have half the userbase fake voat does. What you had was small but authentic, it was bullet proof. Free speech sides with truth, and no enemy of ours could ever penetrate it. Until now - betrayal from within. No standing army can withstand treason.

If this site had a canary it's long dead. I think you know you're a piece of shit, you just can't hide it anymore and you're trying to snuff out any threats of it going public here - in your "one reason to go on". Welp, looks like we see just how valuable this really was to you.

[SearchVoat]

Did you act honorably? Or did you act in your own self interest?...

With respect to the dox rule, that's me putting users first. With respect to the confessions screenshot, that's me acting in my own self interest. No justification other than that.

I am forced to compare it to your confession in which you said your wife accused you of abusing your boys.

I never said that. I said I didn't have access to them, and that's because of the police report about the confessions post. No-one has accused anyone of abuse.