To preempt trigger-happy downvotes: This is not an endorsement of the official narrative. Read the whole thing or move along.

2020 number of deaths (all causes) through 11/28/2020, 2,654,825:

So that's 11 months worth. Even a very simple and naive adjustment yields a projected total, for the whole year, of:

(2,654,825 / 11) * 12 =    2,896,173

That's HIGHER than ALL of the previous year numbers you listed. Slightly higher, sure. But higher. Which contradicts your claim that "Deaths at their lowest in 5 years". And by using only your own sources and numbers, no less.

Making claims such as these, which are patently false and so easily disproved, does not help anyone. It just makes you, and everyone here who buys into it, because it is convenient and happens to support the conclusion they want, look like a fool.

Additionally, as another user pointed out in a different thread, the numbers for the last few weeks are not complete and still subject to being updated as reports come in, with delays of up to 8 weeks or sometimes more. As evidenced by the last two weeks being extremely low, at only 82% and 39% of expected deaths, respectively.

My reply to him paints a more complete picture, I think.

The short version:

There are about 20% more deaths this year than previous years, during the weeks "the pandemic" was a factor, on average.

HOWEVER, about one third of the extra deaths could not be "confirmed or presumed" to be Covid (in spite of their best efforts for taxbux subsidies). These can only be assumed to be deaths caused by the lockdowns and surrounding restrictions, since that is the only other major change this year from previous years.

See Table

This is the same data as from the OPs CDC link for this year. It is just cropped to remove incomplete and irrelevant weeks. It also has four additional columns, to highlight the presumed lockdown morbidity. In other words:

For every 2 deaths blamed on Covid, the lockdowns killed 1 more.

That's just going by those numbers and taking their Covid reports at face value. In reality, it is likely worse. Because we know many of the claimed Covid deaths were actually unrelated causes. Which means the real ratio leans more heavily towards lockdown deaths than towards Covid deaths.

And what for?

Would Covid have killed more than that, without them? How do we know? Even if we assume, would it have been significantly more than that? Enough to warrant everything we've given up? Everything we've been forced to give up? Enough to justify taking it upon ourselves, to impose measures that would kill so many, instead of letting nature run its course, the way it always has? And what of all the suffering caused that hasn't (yet) resulted in death?

Was it worth it?

This is a much better and more honest angle to pursue than trying to claim that deaths are lower than usual this year. They're not. Attempting to claim they are will only get you shot down with your own data, as I did here. And anyone who might have been inclined to believe you will rightfully doubt anything else you said or will say.