Introduction
It’s horrendously easy to build a cult of personality. Even the most mundane behaviors can be–and are–magnified into god-like precognition. For instance, the object of worship drinks a specific brand of soda. The cult leaders will take advantage of people’s cognitive biases and exploit something as simple as this. Perhaps a media story–wholly unrelated in topic–is released which discusses said brand of soda. Regardless of the medical and physiological factuality of this story’s contents, the story is associated with the object of worship. The chain of connections follows:
- Story says drinking beverage equals long life (again, regardless of factuality).
- Object of worship has been drinking beverage for years–certainly since before the story was published.
- Object of worship is “exhibiting precognition” or has “advance knowledge” of the world.
- Object of worship is now more worthy of worship, as he has not only "displayed precognition,” he is “willing to act on it in his personal life.” He is “a shining example”–an archetype to follow.
Put in human terms, “Donald Trump’s longstanding love of Diet Coke is indicative of his preexisting knowledge that the beverage prolongs life, as the story describes! This shows that the man is a master of placing himself in situations that are the most beneficial! Since he lives it himself, we should follow his leadership! Let’s buy Diet Coke™!” Once again, these statements are made by the cult creators irrespective of their factuality. They rely heavily–if not exclusively–on the cognitive bias of the availability cascade…
Now, onto business. Some believe that if Trump fails to deliver on his immigration campaign promises that white Americans will finally be pushed to their limit, will rise up, and hold the ZOG accountable as the destructive, parasitic, deceptive entity it has become. This will never happen. The average white Republican voter (hereafter AWRV) will do anything to support and excuse Trump's abject failures because Trump is his new identity. These voters didn't support Trump because he would do something about immigration, trade, the Middle East, Obamacare, or Hillary. They supported him because he told them it was okay to feel how they do about immigration, trade, the Middle East, Obamacare, and Hillary. He told them they weren't racists like Democrats said they are. He made them feel like winners. He offered them validation–something no one in the Republican Party has done for a long time. These AWRV received a pat on the head from someone they turned into an idol. They will now lap up everything he says, regardless of the damage to themselves and their best interests. The Trump Train trumps objective truth itself.
Don't believe they'll back Trump under any circumstance? Look at who they sent to Congress for the last 75 years. If you believe these people are going to rise up and hold their government accountable, you're in for some serious disappointment. Decade after decade, these voters are sold the same lies while being driven down the same political highway of progress. Decade after decade they send the same puppets to represent them. The difference in 2016 was that Trump took these AWRV off the political highway they've been on for decades, drove on some back roads for a change of scenery, told them some nice stories, made them laugh, took them to his store where they could buy souvenir hats, and then he jumped back on the same highway. They didn't even blink. Nothing. They just sat there in their new hats ready to defend their new identity as Trumpublicans. They're no longer team R, they're team T. Let's go get those Ds!
I'm wrong? Fine. Prove it. Offer valid criticism of Trump, cited and sourced, to one of these AWRV. Tweet something to them. Watch how they respond. I'll wait. It will be exactly how any other leftist responds when you criticize their idols (who behave and vote the same way as the Republican ones). If you don't think there is any valid criticism of Trump, you're the people about whom I'm writing. These AWRV couldn't get out of their own way to save their lives. Look at how much pandering to the idea of Israel was required to get AWRV to vote for even the chance of saving their country from being turned into Mexico 2.0. You want to talk about foreign governments influencing American elections, politics, and society? The list starts and ends with Israel. But it will be a cold day in Hell before Democrats or Republicans say anything negative about jews.
History
White Americans get exactly what they deserve from their own actions (or lack thereof). There is no greater destructive force to the United States than the AWRV. This nation was once 90+% white. Today whites are roughly 48% of the population. Leftist minorities have a major effect on the politics of the United States today, but to go from 90% white to 48% white in 50 years requires both parties to convince their white bases to go along with the multicultural agenda. The AWRV wasn't thrown under the multicultural bus. They voted themselves under the bus, and they did it to appear more "moral" than their opponents.
You're going to see a revival of the moderate left again because of the people Trump had to woo in order to win. I'm talking about the neocon America-First-but-Israel-firsters and other assorted moralists who talk about "our values," "the Christian refugees," and "our exceptional minorities." Their desire to be "morally" superior is going to push swing voters left yet again or turn them off of voting altogether. Self-righteousness doesn't sell to swing voters. They have their own agenda that doesn't revolve around the tug-of-war between Democrats and Republicans over who is morally superior. It's that same desire to be morally superior–to win, to be righteous–that will never allow the AWRV to ever criticize Trump. Jew Party A doesn't hate the victim politics of Jew Party B. They don't hate their other half's strategy of appearing morally superior. The AWRV love it. They want that position for themselves. They covet that position. They want to be the victims because the left made being a victim (and advocating for victims) the "morally" superior position.
Look at abortion. The rhetoric coming from Jew Party A attempts to spin a fetus as a victim–a bigger victim than women–who Jew Party B started using as their victim. Both sides agree that, in the politics of victimhood, women are victims. Because Democrats secured women first, they have the power to direct the conversation on the topic of female victimhood. Today Republicans are attempting to pull the same stunt with fetuses, but it's failing to catch. Why? Because Democrats don't acknowledge a fetus as a victim. Republicans seek acknowledgement and victim validation from Democrats, but they won't give in. They invented victim politics; they're not going to empower the RNC's position. They wont allow their controlled opposition to beat them at their own game.
The AWRV long to be the victim and victim advocates–the position occupied by the Democrats for over fifty years–so they can claim what they believe as the "morally" superior and righteous position. Why do you think they wail on about Christian persecution? They're attempting to establish a victim narrative, just as Democrats did. It's not taking root outside of their more religious base, and the left simply won't acknowledge the position as valid. Republicans lost the morality game. They lost decades ago when they started acknowledging and validating Democrats' positions, and they continue to lose today by attempting to pander to fags, nonwhites, and women, whom Democrats already control.
All moral posturing is absolutely irrelevant to the swing voter. If swing voters cared about the morality of abortion, they'd be Republicans. If they cared about leftist victim politics, they'd be Democrats. Not only do these AWRV want to be seen as the societal victim, it's an imperative that they show the country and the world that "it's the Democrats" who are the "real" racists. "It's the Democrats" who have been the "real" Nazis. One can observe this behavior in the social media activity of an AWRV. Notice how they're always attempting to trot out some African or Hispanic who tells them exactly what they want to hear; how quickly they'll like, share, favorite, and subscribe to the Asian homosexual "christian" in a Trump hat who tells them "it's okay to not bake me a cake for my wedding." They gobble that up faster than it can be produced, and it's morally unconvincing to everyone except the AWRV.
Continued Below (damn character limit)
Tallest_Skil ago
This submission (along with linked ones above) is nothing more than public proof that "effortposting" is utterly meaningless and leads to no change. As there is no operational difference between this and copy/pasting previous "effortposts," the one with the lowest energy requirement makes the most sense.
Tallest_Skil ago
Modernity
These voters–these subhuman cowards–and their personalities are weak. Their sense of self and self-worth is derived from how others perceive them–specifically their enemies. Their self-worth and self-image are not derived internally, but are based on external feedback. Just like all other leftists, they're constantly seeking validation. If they can get validation from others outside of their in-group, that's even better. That's why it's so devastating to their egos when the left refers to these people as racists, and why the term cuck cut so deep thought social media during the last election cycle.
Republicans have accepted what their former enemies (now lovers) have told them–that the term "racist" indicates a moral failing, and that to label someone a racist indicates a moral failing within that person. They've accepted the slur and now try to defend themselves against it to repurpose it for themselves to attack their controlled opposition enemies, a la "Democrats are the real racists." Cuckoldry means weakness. Cuck means putting the interests of others before your own, another moral failing. It's what Republicans have done for as long as I can remember. The term highlights the simpering of these voters and cuts to the core of who these people truly are. Their personalities makes them prime targets for manipulation and mockery since they're constantly seeking validation from some other.
In the grand scheme of US politics these AWRV are cattle. American politics is not over what's good for cattle, but rather over who has the herding rights to cattle. The politician with claim to the herd can use it to assert power over the his opponents. It's about who can secure his position at the top of the losers bracket. This how Candidate Trump became president. He identified the behavior and needs of his market, he corralled them, and he validated them. This is where President Trump has failed. He surrounded himself with supporters who were the butt of every joke for decades, trained to lose by the previous herders, and now instead of strengthening them and being a leader he's simply fulfilling their needs to appear morally superior and have their victimhood validated–what first caused them to be the butt of every joke.
Trump is giving them that feeling of oppression by reinforcing the idea that the media as a whole is corrupt and biased–which they are, but we've known that since long before WWI. Trump's tactic worked because both sides agree that the media is biased. Democrats thinks Republicans are biased (and vice versa), but Trump's narrative–with the obvious collusion and lies printed by leftist media–won. Trump saw an opening in the politics of victimhood and he's allowing these AWRV to feel like they're under constant attack. Because these voters have adopted the Trump identity–the Trump brand–they view any attack on Trump as an attack on them. Donald Trump isn't stupid. Some like to say that when he does something they believe is "out of character"–or outside of what he promised–he's actually "making a chess move." The idea that he's "playing chess"–moving political pieces around–has become the go-to excuse for when Trump fails to deliver on a campaign promise or acts in a way that runs counter to his campaign. He's playing chess, all right. What is the goal of the game? Who is the opponent? What's the objective?
Trump's Presidency
Supporters are left to assume that each move Trump makes is an action to get them everything he promised. Let's look at his behavior to see if that's the case. Candidate Trump promised to repeal and replace Obamacare within the first 100 days. What happened? Congress failed, right? Paul Ryan failed? President Trump shifted the blame onto Ryan for failing to repeal Obamacare. Remember this was a promise from Trump to the American people and not to (or from) Paul Ryan or Congress. Trump didn't come into office with a plan to repeal and replace Obamacare. He came into office with a plan to let someone else take the lead on fulfilling his promise. Doing this served two purposes: to reduce his investment risk if he couldn't deliver, and to look like he was reaching out to work with those the narrative says don't see eye-to-eye. When the promise to repeal and replace failed, who took the blame? It certainly wasn't Trump. If Congress had successfully repealed and replaced Obamacare, who would have received most of the applause? Mull that over before continuing.
This isn't the first time Trump pulled a stunt like this. It won't be the last. Whenever something Trump promised falls through, he shifts the blame onto someone else. Whether or not Trump could have delivered on Obamacare so quickly is irrelevant. It was a massive risk, but he removed the majority of that risk by passing the buck to Congress. Another example is his Muslim ban. What happened? The first travel ban was blocked. Some speculated that he used Obama's list of countries in order to make the left look foolish. Another "chess move," perhaps? Doubtful. He probably used it because it was readily available and he didn't have a list of his own. How about the second travel ban? Blocked as well. A few tweets complaining about judges and that was the end of it. See, "he tried," but what are you going to do right? Not his fault. It's those damned activist judges suppressing the will of the people. We're the victims here, and the President did try his best… right? It's that easy to phone it in.
Trump wouldn't promise something he had no intention of delivering, would he? How's prison treating Hillary? Where are the deportations of even a single nonwhite? Realize that Trump doesn't care about the outcome of the travel ban or any of his other promises. He only cares how he looks. The "chess game" being played is against the public. The goal is to manipulate public perception of Trump the man and Trump the brand. The pieces being moved are White House propaganda and Twitter spin. The mainstream media is complicit in this because they spend their days as the uncritical attack dog of the left rather than engaging in objective journalism and analysis. The media knows Trump is 100% about his brand, and that is what they're set up to destroy.
Donald Trump exists to promote his brand image. His earliest supporters bought the promises, but he sold the AWRV the Trump brand. The Trump brand is success. Pay attention, the idea of success is the Trump brand, but that does not mean Trump or his brand leads to success and getting what you want–or, in this case, getting what Trump promised. He sold the average white American voter the perception of success, and they've wrapped themselves with the Trump brand. That's why those of us who voted for him to fulfill his promises readily criticize him when he fails to deliver, and those who bought the brand are his most strident, vitriolic, and delusional defenders.
If the Trump brand fails, they, too look like failures. Why? They were never Bob (who supports Trump), Jim (who supports Trump), or Steve (who supports Trump). They became The Trump Supporter Bob, and The Trump Supporter Jim, and The Trump Supporter Steve. They've never been anything other than that which they attach to themselves–the football fan, the religious man, the NASCAR guy. They've now attached themselves to the Trump brand. Their fragile egos cant take the hit that would come from even considering the idea that President Trump isn't their savior, and that they may have been tricked when he said that he wanted what was best for them. They don't wish to be viewed as fools. It's the same reason these AWRV care that the left thinks they're racists. It's the same reason they care so much about what blacks, Hispanics, and even Moonmen think of them. They care about how they are perceived by others. "Please don't see me as evil!" "Please don't see me as a racist!" "Please don't see me as a Nazi!" "Please don't see me as gullible!" "Please… please don't see me as a fool."
It's perception–not reality that drives them and the rest of the leftists they claim not to be. Trump know this. It's why the left could so easily stir your typical zionist neoconservative civic nationalist into a hysterical frenzy for the cameras for decades. It's why Trump was able to win their vote. He said he would win and more people started perceiving Trump as a winner. The left called him a racist, so he trotted out some Africans and smooched a few pickaninnies, and that validated these AWRV. The media said he wasn't religious, so he talked about that Jesus guy. He was called an antisemite, and he bragged about his Jewish son-in-law, daughter, and how all his grandkids are jewish, and he did it all without ever becoming hysterical. He did it all without ever acknowledging that the smears could be true. He never validated the attacks as being morally valid. He turned the left into the joke and forced them to acknowledge everything he was saying by giving him airtime and winning, thus Trump became everything those AWRV wanted their image to be; strong, righteous, morally superior, loved by minorities, not racist, and a persecuted victim of the establishment. They adopted his image–his brand–as their own. For these people it was never about the promises, it was about beating the left and being validated.
Continued. (again, damn character limit)
Tallest_Skil ago
Another example of brand preservation was when Candidate Trump: now President Trump, said that Judge Curie, presiding over the Trump University case, was possibly biased because he's a Mexican. That's not necessarily an untrue statement, considering the remarks made by Trump about immigration and the spin placed on it by leftist media outlets. The statements and the spin could have biased the judge against him, but that probably wasn't Trump's concern. He has very good lawyers and they may have told him the case would be lost if it went to court. If he lost in court, that would detract from the brand and make him look like a loser. If he settled, that would look like an admission of guilt. So how best to come out looking clean? Accuse the judge of being biased, use that as an excuse to settle the case, and then tell voters you settled because you don't have time for that mess because you have to Make America Great Again™. Tell the voters you could have won the case, but you weren't sure the trial would have been fair, and you didn't want to spend time in appeals. Trump comes out looking like the bigger man, he gets to take a shot at the judge's reputation for messing with him, and those who brought suit against Trump look like they were abusing the judicial system to attack what the AWRV views as a great man trying to fix the country.
Summary
Trump's end goal is always to appear successful, regardless of the actual outcome. The Trump presidency is about ensuring the perceived success of the Trump brand–the legacy of the name–and not about the promises he made as a man, nor certainly the ideology he personally upholds and enacts, as it's entirely against the will of the only people who voted for him. As long as he can shift the blame and make someone else responsible for his failures, the brand remains untarnished. If you have difficulty believing this, I ask you to look at his businesses. Trump sells his image and his name. You buy Trump steaks. You live, stay, rent, work out of a Trump building. You visit a Trump golf course. What
makes these steaks, buildings, and golf courses different from the rest? The name. The brand. The consumer's perception. This is basic marketing. If you make the customer feel like a winner, or feel smart, or feel sexy for buying or using your product, you can sell them almost anything–even sticks of cancer and poisoned corn syrup in a metal can. Once they adopt the brand as their identity, they'll fight tooth and nail to defend their purchase even if it's slowly killing them.
Realize that President Trump has no ideology other than to win–or appear to win–in any given situation. He wanted to be president, so he did what he had to and made whatever promises he needed to in order to achieve that goal. Now that the goal has been reached, he's going to do whatever he has to do in order to preserve his brand. That kind of selfish betrayal is going to kill any semblance of "conservatism" more than the left ever could. When the fence–never mind an actual wall–on the border is left incomplete, Trump will walk away unscathed, because the people he rallied bought into the brand, not the outcome. He has already set the stage to shift the blame to Congress again. If he does get the funding, he'll be ready to take all the credit. It's a win-win for Donald Trump–the brand and the man.
The only thing currently biting him in the rear is his failure to end DACA or to deport a single illegal. It only requires a stroke of a pen. No judges or Congress to blame. That's why Sean Spicer has had such a difficult time explaining away this failure. Notice the angle—we'll deal with them "with heart". He's appealing to the desire of his AWRV custome… voters to be more "morally" superior to and more righteous than the left. Will the propaganda take hold? Will these AWRV take the bait, swallow it, digest it, and then regurgitate it on social media as if it was the outcome they wanted all along? Yep. Always. Now he's calling for amnesty and they're right behind him. If you decide to criticize Trump on this, you'll be branded a leftist faster than you can blink.
The next time Trump fails to deliver on a promise, ask yourself: "Did I vote for what Donald Trump promised to accomplish or did I buy the brand?" Right now, Trump has absolutely no reason to fulfill any campaign promise (after allowing the media to pretend that he made a halfhearted attempt). The majority of his brand loyalists don't care about the outcome. They just want to feel like they're victims of the left–of which they're already a part. They just want to feel like they're "morally" superior They just want to feel like they're the good guys struggling against evil. They just want to feel like they're winning.
Do you feel like you're winning?
albeit ago
Hmm. Believing that:
1. There was no stroke of a pen
2. Chief Justice John Roberts has zero blame for ruling that an executive order cannot repeal another executive order
3. Anyone cares what former press secretary Sean Spicer can explain in 2020.
If these aren't psychotic delusions, they're laziness and/or inattention to detail.
Reps/Dems may seem like little more than football teams to you. But elections do have consequences. In the general election there is a choice between gun-grabbing wannabe tyrant corporate leftists, and orange man. If you're convinced that acceleration is the best way forward, then maybe you should vote for the other ZOG'd party's candidate (Biden). I didn't see other GOP/Dem candidates in 2016 who were better leaders with better proposals to fix problems. I'd rather not have the TPP, the Paris Climate Accord, a president beholden to political correctness for his every waking moment, reliance on foreign oil, higher legal immigration, etc. I'm not going to argue one way or another over the "AWRV" construct, except to note that doing so would be falling into the "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
Tallest_Skil ago
There wasn’t.
“Judicial review” as per Mv.M is unconstitutional. He has absolutely no power to stop Trump enforcing existing written law, the Constitution, and natural law.
It’s a historical reference.
List the consequences. You can’t. There aren’t any. Every. Single. Last. One. Of. Them. Votes. Identically.
Who grabbed guns, lied about his campaign promises, has done nothing to undo the unconstitutional gun laws of the last century... etc.
No, I’m utterly unconvinced that doing what jews want is the best way to defeat jews.
“Jews hate it when you do what they want” is not an argument.
False dichotomy. No one has to accept your jewish theater at all.
We have that, though. It’s under different names.
Still beholden to its requirements thanks to our manufacturing being neutered.
He worships queers. He supports trannies. He does nothing but praise nonwhites. He has never, not once–EVER–said ANYTHING positive about whites. He has publicly denounced white nationalism as evil and illegal.
Which he’s… taking from Syria in an illegal conflict.
What about it? Oh, you mean the higher legal immigration that he himself is responsible for? And the zero deportations? King Nigger deported more than Trump. King Nigger imported fewer than Trump.
Literally wouldn’t. Where’s the white nationalist political party? Where’s anyone, anywhere, presenting any organized resistance against anything whatsoever that jews are doing? Anywhere? At all? Anyone? At any level? ANY. WHERE. Why can’t you support your own claims?
captainstrange ago
Imagine being someone who allows a vote by foreigners, strangers, and other bolshevik scum to decide whether or not you can own guns, or if you'll have to give them up.
Ken_bingo2 ago
Judge Curie is a La Raza member, so that might not be a great example.
You make good points and I have said similar things about parts of it in other places.
NoBS ago
Triggered like a bitch. All I read was (damn character limit) and winning.
Sure, if you say so.