Tavistock, Think Tanks and the Pedo erotica enslavement of the New World Order:
http://www.yogaesoteric.net/content.aspx?lang=EN&item=6732 http://archive.is/zAYnx "Originally led by the British Secret Intelligence officer, Major John Rawlings, the Tavistock Institute was designed even from the beginning as a coordinating center for the planetary social control using "psychological shock troops" - a term invented by Reese. These shock troops in white laboratory coats branch just like a planetary fan, penetrating various organizations to implement policies considered productive by the strategists of the organization. The Tavistock core is formed by British Secret Intelligence agents, freemasons working with the heads of the psychiatry hydra worldwide to achieve two goals:

(1) A unique world order in which the national states are abolished and there is only one totalitarian control center.

(2) Simultaneously, the psychological control of the world, or to use the term invented by them, "societry" (t.n. free translation: a method of accurate structuring of the social relations). Even the official documents of the Tavistock Institute admit its global orientation towards the global control of people's minds."

Regarding (1), today we see the weeds: Open Borders, Open Societies, Civil Society movements, which we now know were subversive schemes planted in the mid to late 19th Century.

Regarding (2)…Snowflakes that can’t see past their genitalia, False Flags and other political theater, Censorship, DeepState, Mk-Ultra, 24/7 Globalized fake news via MSM.

See this: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1433300 LINKS BETWEEN SOROS, CF, AND TAVISTOCK from lonewolf9642: “I would like for this to be the main repository of information regarding this particular lead of FBIAnon. I encourage independent follow up research, and would appreciate to be updated on findings to update this post. I leave you with a quote from Aldous Huxley, a member of the Tavistock group. "There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."

Think Tanks, Great Britian, Socialism and Gay Rights and PIE http://www.fabians.org.uk/about/the-fabian-story/ http://archive.is/wVFOD

The Early Fabians: “Educate, Agitate, Organise” The Fabian Society is Britain’s oldest political think tank.

"The Fabian Society emerged in 1884 as an off-shoot of the Fellowship of the New Life. The new Society soon attracted some of the most prominent left-wing thinkers of the late Victorian era to their ranks." ‘The Society has and continues to be at the forefront of developing political ideas and public policy on the left.’

Edward Carpenter (29 August 1844 – 28 June 1929) was a founding member of the Fellowship of the New Life and was at the first meeting in 1883. He was also one of the founders of the Fabian Society, the Labour Party and one of the most well-known people of the century. He was an English poet, socialist philosopher, anthologist, and early gay rights activist. He was interested in the main ideas of the Fellowship, including politics, sexual radicalism and the works of Henry Havelock Ellis.[12]

Fellowship of New Life: Founded in 1883, by the Scottish intellectual Thomas Davidson and disbanded in 1898. He mused that pure intelligence would lead to a better and higher society. The Society objective was "The cultivation of a perfect character in each and all." …transform society by setting an example of clean simplified living for others to follow. Many of the Fellowship's members advocated pacifism, vegetarianism and simple living, under the influence of Leo Tolstoy's ideas.[5] But when some members (like the sexual radical Edward Carpenter), also wanted to become politically involved to aid society's transformation, it was decided that a separate society, the Fabian Society, would also be set up. “and although the society was a branch of the Fellowship of the New Life, Thomas Davidson shared no sympathies with Fabianism.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellowship_of_the_New_Life

Havelock Ellis, Lolita, & The Sexual Child (Occult Yorkshire 3)

By Jasun Horsley November 18, 2015 https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2015/11/18/three-havelock-ellis-lolita-the-sexual-child/ Horsley’s blog begins,

“The link between the Fabian Society and the Pedophile Information Exchange, while unmistakable, was also inconclusive. It was necessary to go further back, to the founding Fabians, to get a better sense of the philosophy which my grandfather embraced.”…

Havelock Ellis is attributed with coining the word “homosexual” and was one of the first people in history to show an academic interest in pedophilia. (The term did not become widespread until the 1950s.)[1] This is hardly surprising, since Ellis compiled a six-volume work entitled Studies In The Psychology Of Sex, between 1897 and 1928.

Ellis was reputedly a sexual experimenter as well as a drug user, and allegedly even combined the two (hallucinogens and private group sex sessions). The writings of Ellis were among the key texts that formed the basis for sex education in British colleges and, later, schools. Ellis is sometimes known today as “the father of social psychology.” From Science in the Bedroom: A History of Sexual Research, by Vern L. Bullough (Basic Books, 1995, p. 76):

“To get a sense of how far-reaching Ellis’ influence is—not apart from but congruent with his influence on literature—there was a syllabus in the 1990s at Cornell University called “The Sexual Child,”… Though not mentioned here, Havelock Ellis was included in the course.

Lectures had titles such as “The Child as Sexual Object and Sexual Subject,” “Big Bad Wolves,” “Loving Children,” and “Having Children” (for which one of the readings was Nabokov’s Lolita). English Professor Ellis Hanson, the course instructor, defended the course’s content by stating, “The erotic fascination with children is ubiquitous. One could hardly read a newspaper or turn on a television without feeling obliged to accept, study, and celebrate it.” In his own words, the course was designed to “undermine preconceived notions about what a child is, what sexuality is, and what it means to love or desire a child.” (link)

The bisexual trans man Pat Califa also contributed to the course. In a piece included in the course, Carifa wrote:

“Culturally induced schizophrenia allows parents to make sentimental speeches about the fleeting innocence of childhood and the happiness of years unbroken by carnal lust—and exhaust themselves policing the sex lives of their children. Children are celibate because their parents prevent them from playing with other little kids or adults. . . . They are not innocent; they are ignorant, and that ignorance is deliberately created and maintained by parents. . . Even though many prominent sex researchers have documented the existence of sexual capacity in children (for instance Kinsey verified the occurrence of orgasm in girls and boys at less than six months of age), our society is fanatically determined to deny it.”

And in that simple statement we come full circle of the great lie, that “science” justifies pedophilia to meet the needs of sex starved children and babies, because parents are ignorant by not participating in or allowing child molestation.

(Of course we know that Kinsey did not engage in science as much as he did indulge his own sado-masochism, by paying a Nazi child rapist murderer and other pedophiles for their ongoing study or ‘stats’, then using the data as though it represented the norm of human sexuality because it was healthy and natural for children. I seriously doubt at this point that radical human sexuality professors care about that and will continue to indoctrinate college students with the great lie).