I have made a decision to alter and/or remove various restrictions on Voat. I’ve thought a lot about this and it’s something both @Atko and I believe needs to be reevaluated.
Voat has always had a problem with spam. @Amalek would spam posts and hijack the new queue making it unusable. MH101 and then later @SaneGoatiSwear would hijack comment pages making them unusable. The rules Voat uses were put in place in to combat this behavior. They are old rules, mostly remaining unchanged from the initial versions of this site. Most, if not all, of the rules were in direct response to spam attacks. It was never Voat’s intention to limit non-spam accounts, but this is what has happened as an indirect result of these rules.
Voat will not keep in place a system that permanently limits a segment of users from debating and conversing. This isn’t Free Speech as I see it or as I want it.
Voat will shortly be going live with a new code base, and I want to have a new system designed and ready for when this happens, so I am posting this announcement to get feedback from the community.
The main areas of concern:
- Commenting restrictions on negative CCP accounts that aren't spamming their comments
- Limiting any account that spam comments
TL;DR
We need to allow unpopular opinions while preventing comment spam.
How do we do it?
All options are on the table
https://voat.co/v/announcements/1330806
view the rest of the comments →
Diogenes_The_Cynic ago
You could place a throttle on new account creation. For example, every new account would cost $5, or needs a unique email address from a recognized email provider, or require sms verification. Each has drawbacks, but sms has the least.
This might also throttle growth, so its not necessarily great for the future of the site. But raising the "price" of a new account would make users value their accounts more.
These are not my actual suggestion, however. My real suggestion would be to have an iceberg-model for voat. Surface voat would stay the same, but voat could avoid bad-faith users by making more of the site, like the internal chat functions on designated subverses invite-only with a reasonable donation. Something like $50. This would make funding for the site more opaque, but it would give problem users a specific space for them to fling their shit.