The danger in the opinion of Justice Thomas is that he wants to infringe on reserved rights ( amendment 10).
This utility type of thinking was the foundation on which women became a ward of the state, due to the out of thin air inserted states interest.
Just like eminent domain, this opens the potential, and given the responses here and in Roe v Wade discussions, to obfuscation of the issue for reasons of expediency.
Although abortion has never been viewed as a practice morally superior, it was considered a choice a woman was allowed to make, as it is within her natural right.
Historically, the closer to the moment of birth the emotionally heavier the decision.
Please consult any encyclopedia before the 20st century. It will show you this very fact. Common law has always entertained this decision to be in the province of women and as a freedom.
Scotus should not legislate morals. If one were so inclined, accept the baby in your life, those that cannot may then use their freedom to make a decision you do not agree with, bit in a free society that is perfectly fine.
The left: abortion yes, guns no
The right: abortion no, guns yes.
Question: do ypu understand what liberty actually means?
view the rest of the comments →
redtoe_skipper ago
The danger in the opinion of Justice Thomas is that he wants to infringe on reserved rights ( amendment 10).
This utility type of thinking was the foundation on which women became a ward of the state, due to the out of thin air inserted states interest.
Just like eminent domain, this opens the potential, and given the responses here and in Roe v Wade discussions, to obfuscation of the issue for reasons of expediency.
Although abortion has never been viewed as a practice morally superior, it was considered a choice a woman was allowed to make, as it is within her natural right.
Historically, the closer to the moment of birth the emotionally heavier the decision.
Please consult any encyclopedia before the 20st century. It will show you this very fact. Common law has always entertained this decision to be in the province of women and as a freedom.
Scotus should not legislate morals. If one were so inclined, accept the baby in your life, those that cannot may then use their freedom to make a decision you do not agree with, bit in a free society that is perfectly fine.
The left: abortion yes, guns no The right: abortion no, guns yes.
Question: do ypu understand what liberty actually means?