In https://qmap.pub/read/629 Q suggested that John Perry Barlow was not safe.
He died unexpectedly several days later on February 7th, 2018.
So we have 3 possibilities:
- Q just happened to guess that something was going to happen to JPB within several days
- Q "predicted" the death of JPB by killing him
- Q had access to intelligence suggesting something would happen to JPB
Option 1 can be removed because it is such an astronomically lucky guess.
Option 2 can be removed because there is no national manhunt to find this dangerous killer who took out JPB and, somehow, John McCain. Surely the MSM would be pushing this story: Trump supporters following the posts of a deranged conspiracy theorist who kills people to prove his points.
So are left with option 3 due to eliminating the other two options.
This is not a commentary on the motivations of Q. This logic does not prove that Q is not a "bad" psyop. However, I think the idea that Q is just some guy making vague guesses on the internet has been debunked at this point. It is by far the biggest idea pushed by shills and self-important smartass faggots, and it has no logical basis.
DankOrganism ago
They've made up their minds without even looking at the data(not even a quick skimming of highlights); clear result of a narrative being pushed on them(by MSM, online echo chambers, late shows, ect). If you look into cult brain-washing techniques you really start to notice the signs pop up.
The amount of coordinated attacks from the swamp is my personal proof(among others, but that's the big one), but this is a good proof tracks for sure. Good post.
NoBS ago
Or he posted his name to make him a harder target to kill because of the publicity. If I had a whistle blower who was known leaker, then protecting him using civilian investigators as a safety net is likely. Particularly if it's the cops who want him dead.