The SearchVoat Forum

Richard Gardner - 1974 In short, the 'house of world order' would have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

“Founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Trilateral Commission embarked on a New International Economic Order based on Technocracy. Brzezinski called this the “Technetronic Era” in his 1970 book, Between Two Ages. History now reveals the original Trilateral strategy and the means by which they have carried it out” – Patrick Wood

technocracy was a movement that gained popularity in the 1930s which sought to construct a system for scientifically engineering society. In the technocrats’ vision, the world would be divided into regional units called “technates” which would be run by “technocrats”: scientists, engineers, economists and others with specialized knowledge of specific technical fields. According to this ideology, economic (and thus societal and even geopolitical) turmoil could be eliminated when consumption and production are perfectly balanced by a cadre of learned technocrats with access to total oversight of all economic data.

The idea was ludicrous. The type of technology that would have been required to properly administer this technocracy—technology for monitoring every industrial process, every product and every transaction in the economy—simply did not exist when the idea was first conceived.

...Technocratic governments are crisis governments. And most western democracies are in crisis and will remain in crisis for several years to come. The grip of scientists will tighten around the neck of governments. We have already seen how [Covid19 related] mathematical modelling has shaped precautionary “circuit-breaks”, regional tiering, and strategies for testing and case detection. But the reach of science goes beyond the day-to-day management of the outbreak. Tzvetan Todorov, in his 2006 book In Defence of the Enlightenment, asked what kind of intellectual and moral base should we seek to build our communal life in an age where God was dead and our utopias had collapsed. He turned to “the humanist dimension of the Enlightenment” that was based on three principles. First, autonomy—“giving priority to what individuals decide for themselves”. We should seek “total freedom to examine, question, criticise, and challenge dogmas and institutions”. Second, the end purpose of that freedom should be humanism: “Human beings had to impart meaning to their earthly lives.” And third, universality. “The demand for equality followed from the principle of universality.”

Knowledge was to be a critical force in this project. And the “emancipation of knowledge paved the way for the development of science”. But science can all too easily be corrupted into scientism, which then becomes “a distortion of the Enlightenment, its enemy not its avatar”. Danger comes when political choices are equated with scientific deductions, when good is only derived from truth. At that moment, a society comes to believe that the world is completely knowable. Experts are sought not only to set political objectives, but also to formulate moral norms. At that moment, democracy is in jeopardy.

And do you know where MISTER Olsen WORKS?

Sir Adam Beck Power Plant, where the power failed and knocked out power to the entire northeast section of the United States and Southeast section of Canada! They're just checking to make sure they can do it, and they can!

[Joshua] Haldeman resigned from Technocracy, Inc. sometime in 1941, when its New York-based central office changed its policies from "unequivocally opposed to Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Socialism" to "complete economic and military collaboration with Soviet Russia" following Hitler's invasion of the USSR.4 Always a man of strong convictions and principles, Joshua Haldeman could find no justification for any alliance with Stalin's godless dictatorship.

For a brief period (1941-1943) the iconoclastic chiropractor sought to establish his own political party within Saskatchewan, and to this end published a regular newsletter, Total War & Defense. This effort was less successful than hoped for,'2 and Dr. Haldeman redirected his loyalties to the Social Credit Party (SCP). The SCP had been in power in Alberta for several years and was seeking to expand its influence in Saskatchewan. It would be recalled that Haldeman had been "a member of the original Douglas Social Credit League".3 In 1944 he served as Provincial Coordinator of the Saskatchewan Social Credit League, and by May, 1945 was the Vice-President and Provincial Secretary of the party, at which time he ran unsuccessfully as the Social Credit Candidate For Prince Albert Federal Constituency.3...

...In the late 1940s Dr. Haldeman's multiple responsibilities, including his political activities for the Social Credit Association, his activism within the DCCC and his role as a member of the Board of Directors of the CMCC began to take a toll on his practice. In the autumn of 1949 he tendered his resignation as chairman of the national council of the Social Credit Party, which was not at first accepted.