Request for Anti Corruption catch-all board/sub.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:30 pm
Hey @SearchVoat , so back on Voat I had v/aacce ("Argos Anti Corruption Civilian Effort") which although underutilized served as a subverse for general anti corruption research covering a wide range of facets.
I was hoping to have something similar set up here just under a more general name (eg: "Anti Corruption" or "Corruption Watch"); something simple and to the point of being a catch all.
Why not post your content to:
I was hoping to have something similar set up here just under a more general name (eg: "Anti Corruption" or "Corruption Watch"); something simple and to the point of being a catch all.
Why not post your content to:
- Pizzagate? Pizzagate is more specifically geared to conclusive posts directly related to pedophilia; the board/sub in question is not strictly for either, that is to say speculative posts are welcome within reason and pedophilia is but one of many viable angles/subjects in the anti corruption catch all. (No offense intended, @Vindicator , @darkknight111 , @EricKaliberhall )
- Great Awakening? Without wishing to be a dick about it, I personally don't feel that GA is the best fit due to it's pro-Q/Trump bias. The anti corruption catch all is intended to allow freedom of speculation (or posting of conclusive material) relating to corruption wherever it may be found which may at times contradict the premise and bias of GA. (No offense intended, @Crensch )
- Conspiracy? Not a label I want attached to serious efforts.
- ClownWorld? Seems more like a, uh... what's the word I'm looking for here... ClownWorld seems more like a "lol, look at this shit" sub, whereas this would be more about bringing together information with purpose rather than just for a cynical giggle.
Open to suggestions for sub/board title and description, otherwise, happy for "Corruption Watch" or whatever you deem appropriate with a description of "Catch all board for serious research into potential corruption".
cc: @kestrel9
PS: While I have your attention SV, it seems that your code for @ mentions does not ignore punctuation such as , and ).