Page 1 of 4
voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:54 am
by tokui
It's run by a poal-level censorfag. He presumes ability to know your intent - without asking. If he's
offended, that's it, ip ban. No warning. Whats that remind you of?
That shit is
not "voat".
Here you can see for yourself who is & isn't free speech. Watch the alt npcs, they are jews in disguise (getting under muh skin, offensive, blah blah). Only 1 faggot raised the free speech alarm, 1 faggot inquired wtf is the TOS.
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=6068d6d724f90
https://archive.is/E4XE5
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=6068e46d98758
https://archive.ph/CobuZ
Why was I banned? For being an asshole? For being a creep? Being offensive? To whom? That's not illegal. And try putting that in a TOS.
Why don't you name it BLM. Buttlickingmob.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:08 am
by chrimony
You got banned for posting child porn, you sick fuck. It's right in the link you gave:
"I made the decision to disable the account after seeing a photo he posted of a grown man open mouth kissing a young girl."
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:17 am
by tokui
Words are not cp. A public, 100% legal photo drawn from jewgle is not cp. Accusations are not proof of cp.
Try harder.
Dumbfags like you enjoy freedoms others fought to give you, for you to turn around and throw it away.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:21 am
by tokui
chrimony wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:08 am
You got banned for posting child porn, you sick fuck. It's right in the link you gave:
"I made the decision to disable the account after seeing a photo he posted of a grown man open mouth kissing a young girl."
You are the complacent shit that's resulted in the public's muzzling while the nation is dismantled. You are the fucking enemy of freedom and this nation.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:56 am
by Deleted User 146629
tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:17 am
Words are not cp. A public, 100% legal photo drawn from jewgle is not cp. Accusations are not proof of cp.
Try harder.
Dumbfags like you enjoy freedoms others fought to give you, for you to turn around and throw it away.
Okay but why did you want to post a grown man making out with a little girl (assuming that's true)? Also porn/obscenities aren't protected by the first amendment, I forget the judge's name but he described those things as "I know it when I see it." If the legal system wasn't run by pedos itself that could get the website taken down, from a legal standpoint it isn't protected speech. So no one has fought for your freedom to post that, unless you count WW2 when Americans fought the Nazis to make the world safe for degeneracy.
Also something being on Google doesn't mean it's legal, I doubt they vet cp. In fact I bet they promote it.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:58 am
by shewhomustbeobeyed
All pornographers and their customers get the rope.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:08 am
by tokui
shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:58 am
All pornographers and their customers get the rope.
Oh piss off you downvote fairy. You think I don't see you actively seeking out my comments - **months** past buried comments - to brigade. You are the fucking backstabbing beta coward in every workplace.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:19 am
by Cynabuns
That post would not have stayed up on Original Voat.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:26 am
by tokui
Cynabuns wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:19 am
That post would not have stayed up on Original Voat.
You're full of shit. Your ilk is what destroys, while pointing your finger elsewhere.
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:28 am
by tokui
T-bitty wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:56 am
tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:17 am
Words are not cp. A public, 100% legal photo drawn from jewgle is not cp. Accusations are not proof of cp.
Try harder.
Dumbfags like you enjoy freedoms others fought to give you, for you to turn around and throw it away.
Okay but why did you want to post a grown man making out with a little girl (assuming that's true)? Also porn/obscenities aren't protected by the first amendment, I forget the judge's name but he described those things as "I know it when I see it." If the legal system wasn't run by pedos itself that could get the website taken down, from a legal standpoint it isn't protected speech. So no one has fought for your freedom to post that, unless you count WW2 when Americans fought the Nazis to make the world safe for degeneracy.
Also something being on Google doesn't mean it's legal, I doubt they vet cp. In fact I bet they promote it.
Everyone better have a good reason for using any bad words or disagreeable arguments. Listen to your compromised self.