Page 1 of 4
Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:56 am
by Heisenberg123
This is kind of interesting, in last days US Strategic Command account on Twitter tweeted weird message that could mean "Q acquitted" ->
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56578544
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/gibberis ... and-child/
Officially it was a child, relative of one of the people who had access to the account, who accidentally made that tweet.
Here you can run that tweet through cryptogram solver:
http://rumkin.com/tools/cipher/cryptogram-solver.php
Just copy this ->
;l;;gmlxzssaw
Ofc that "child made my tweet!" explanation is pretty bullshit. For me it's either troll or attracting Q followers for some reason - good or bad.
But what I find interesting is that other cryptogram solvers don't show the same result.
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:00 am
by Deleted User 146629
Q isn't real. It's time to move on dawg, neither Trump nor Q will save you.
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:16 am
by Heisenberg123
T-bitty
It's obviously real as person from the gov who attracted millions of followers, basically build new movement. But we don't know his/their motivations fully.
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:22 am
by Deleted User 146629
Heisenberg123 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:16 am
T-bitty
It's obviously real as person from the gov who attracted millions of followers, basically build new movement. But we don't know his/their motivations fully.
It's obviously not a person, it's a psyop at best, based on the fact it's on a former meme page and has accomplished nothing. Kind of like the Bolsheviks Operation Trust that kept Whites from fighting them by sowing in them false hope:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Trust
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:25 am
by Heisenberg123
T-bitty
It is a person/s, who do you think is running psyops? AI? Ofc it's people.
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:31 am
by Deleted User 146629
Heisenberg123 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:16 am
T-bitty
It's obviously real as person from the gov who attracted millions of followers, basically build new movement. But we don't know his/their motivations fully.
It attracted millions of lambs to the slaughter. You know it's intentions, to placate people so they wouldn't lift a finger to stop Jews from genociding whites, it's an old trick. At best, it could be 100% fake as well.
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:54 am
by Heisenberg123
T-bitty
But what would fake even mean? A troll? A gov figure trolling? Well some of its aspects definitely go into territory that it cannot be trolling.
I don't know his/their intentions. I'm not judging it completely. When it comes to aspects of what they caused through this - to make people do nothing, I'm not sure about that, in my view it revitalized research community, brought some of the lesser known research closer to mainstream. Media screamed it even caused new satanic panic/blood libel (accusation against Jews)
But on the other hand if its really a big set up for patriots then we won't know this easily, maybe even after some years.
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:06 am
by Deleted User 146629
Heisenberg123 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:54 am
T-bitty
But what would fake even mean? A troll? A gov figure trolling? Well some of its aspects definitely go into territory that it cannot be trolling.
I don't know his/their intentions. I'm not judging it completely. When it comes to aspects of what they caused through this - to make people do nothing, I'm not sure about that, in my view it revitalized research community, brought some of the lesser known research closer to mainstream. Media screamed it even caused new satanic panic/blood libel (accusation against Jews)
But on the other hand if its really a big set up for patriots then we won't know this easily, maybe even after some years.
Fake would essentially mean a troll. It would mean that no one of any notability was involved. I agree, I lean more towards it being a psyop against whites as well.
You have historical examples that tell you the intention, to keep you complacent as the Bolsheviks genocide you. Why is the swamp not drained then? If by research you mean getting on one obscure former meme page, then no, it hurt the research community. I'm sorry? Perhaps I misunderstand but Jews as a group are evil and so are most individual Jews (I compiled a bunch of sources here):
viewtopic.php?t=2428
You know right now it was a setup, I'm betting you believe the election was stolen yet despite that no one did anything about it. Also this:
https://youtu.be/IzNEfSucw5Q
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:20 am
by Heisenberg123
T-bitty
I don't agree about research part although as any mass movement it attracted a lot of different element, it basically accelerated all that was being done since so called "pizzagate" episode to cosmic levels and the "blood libel" thing I've mentioned is meaning that media basically started to scream that "QAnon crazies" are pushing antisemitic conspiracy theories, and I mean, they were not wrong, but this was actually a good thing that came from Q, more distrust towards MSM and the elite, but the question is ... who is Q, what's his/their intention, their history, who they really are. I would not agree to blindly trust anyone that is going full secretive, cryptic and especially without real action following words at least in public light.
I was looking in real time as research is dying out in some places and Q generated needed interest, something that just wasn't there since 2016 elections. That was most certainly positive. Biggest negative is big words, no actions, swamp not drained but even gaining more power and censorship growing.
Re: Q comms from US Strategic Command account/or troll?
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:33 am
by Deleted User 146629
Heisenberg123 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:20 am
T-bitty
I don't agree about research part although as any mass movement it attracted a lot of different element, it basically accelerated all that was being done since so called "pizzagate" episode to cosmic levels and the "blood libel" thing I've mentioned is meaning that media basically started to scream that "QAnon crazies" are pushing antisemitic conspiracy theories, and I mean, they were not wrong, but this was actually a good thing that came from Q, more distrust towards MSM and the elite, but the question is ... who is Q, what's his/their intention, their history, who they really are. I would not agree to blindly trust anyone that is going full secretive, cryptic and especially without real action following words at least in public light.
I was looking in real time as research is dying out in some places and Q generated needed interest, something that just wasn't there since 2016 elections. That was most certainly positive. Biggest negative is big words, no actions, swamp not drained but even gaining more power and censorship growing.
The Jewish religion supports raping children, which I sourced in my last post. The MSM has been non stop corrupt since the Spanish American War, if it took Donald Trump and "Q" for you to realize that then well, I don't know how to say it politely, but it speaks more of your intelligence then it does of their importance. Probably a couple of FBI members paid to fuck with you, their intention is proven to placate you. Well good.
Research is still dead, if you want you can go through my posts, I have some actual research that isn't just a Twitter screenshot (not to toot my own horn). You are right though, if you had done research in 2016 you'd know Donald Trump is a sleazy business and Zionist extraordinaire, I fell for him too though, which is why I want to help you. So you're saying Q did more harm than good? Your research is worthless if people don't get to see it.