McMartin cover up - important context found on Voat
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2021 8:09 pm
Source: https://searchvoat.co/v/pizzagate/3078165 posted by angelafogo
Finger: https://www.iberlibro.com/INTERNATIONAL ... id=1&pid=1
https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory ... 155501.jpg
https://archive.org/details/Finger1980D ... 1/mode/2up
https://ia902802.us.archive.org/8/items ... %20(4).jpg
La Star: https://archive.vn/B9mEu/97b47c7e983039 ... 913924.jpg
This hit piece tried to completely clear Eberles of all accusations but in my view it failed to do so by mentioning stories of child sex abuse being sent to Finger magazine:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_and_Shirley_EberleI will write this post fast & hard so the message sticks.
The McMartin abuse scandal was the flag of the Satanic Ritual Abuse panic in the 80s. The case was delegitimized intentionally in order to install the idea that there was a paranoid witch hunt in the american society with no real evidence. Abused children showed real signs of abused corroborated by experts. Also they spoke of tunnels below the school which were never corroborated by the police, though the media used the statement to further reinforce the theory of all being fabricated fantasies of the children. Fact is there are tunnels, the families of the abused children dig them up in the 1990s."The tunnels are extensive, include a large room just as the children said, and lead to further sites off the property. The tunnels were found in an archeological dig under the pre-school conducted by Dr. E. Gary Stickel, archaeologist and director of Environmental Research Archaeologists, a Scientific Consortium." Here is the link http://web.archive.org/web/200104120850 ... artin.html
And now, the most important part of my findings. Paul and Shirley Eberle were the authors chosen by the Cabal to dismiss the McMartin abuses as fantasies and paranoia, bringing down the entire SRA panic to a mockery. He wrote "The Abuse of Innocence" which is basically a lie and established the idea that children were forced to declare fantasies. The Eberles also wrote the Politics of Child Abuse (Secaucus, N.) Lyle Stuard Inc., 1986) which centers on the McMartin case as the bellwether of the nationwide “child abuse witch hunt” (p. 285) “resulting in the devastation of innocent peoples lives and families (p, 283). Both books lionized defendants and defense interests while defaming everything and everyone associated with child protection. Such polemics also illustrate the gospel of the dual attack on child protection. Ritual abuse cases are first debunked as de factor frauds, then all sexual abuse complaints are tarred with the same brush..” We believe that every molestation case in which there has been a conviction should be reopened and reviewed.” (The Politics of Child Abuse, p. 284). The Eberles have been cited as experts in sexual abuse trials. They were featured speakers at a conference of the Victims of Child Abuse Laws, a group formed to protect accused parents.
** Now, who were the Eberle?** This is where it gets interesting. The Eberle were publishers of and Underground magazine called FINGER (a word easily recognizable by the pedocommunity and widely used in the Elsagate videos). This magazine featured zoofilia, scat, S&m and yes, pedophilia. So i found a cover of the mag. And check the title "Masters, Slaves, Babies, Dog, etc" Editorial by Paul & Shirley Eberle. (if somebody can archive this image please)
https://www.iberlibro.com/INTERNATIONAL ... id=1&pid=1
I also found this issue complete. It features a lot of hardcore stuff. https://archive.org/details/Finger1980D.D.TeoliJr.A.C.1
Check this out https://ia902903.us.archive.org/3/items ... (4).jpgJPG
So basically what you have just read is evidence that the writers that wrote the book which summarised and delegimitized the McMartin case (which mas the most important case of the SRA panic in the 80s) and which were later cited for counsel on how to make the McMartin movie (Indictment) which was based, of course, on their book, yes, they were publishers of the most important pedo-magazine in USA.
“the Eberles were the most prolific publishers of child pornography in the United States” a statement made by Sgt. Toby Tyler, a San Bernadino deputy sheriff who is a nationally recognized expert on child pornography. The Tampa Tribune-Times, July 25, 1993, p.10.
Please help me spread this like wildfire and archive everything.
Paul R. Eberle and Shirley Eberle are American authors. Paul Eberle is a former writer for the Los Angeles Free Press.[1]
Publications
In the 1970s, the Eberles published an Adult publication called Finger.[2]
In 1972 they wrote The Adventures of Mrs. Pussycat, a children's book.
In the 1970s, They Published and sold the paper "LA Star" in news racks throughout Los Angeles and other states .[2][3][1]
They published The Politics of Child Abuse in 1986. It discusses false allegation of child sexual abuse in the day care sex abuse hysteria.[4][3][1]
In 1993 they published The Abuse of Innocence on the McMartin preschool trial.[5] Alan Dershowitz called the book, The Abuse of Innocence, "... a wake-up call to those who believe that prosecutors and their experts can be trusted to do justice in the emotional context of child abuse."[6][7][1]
In 2006, Paul Eberle published a book on road rage.[8]
Finger: https://www.iberlibro.com/INTERNATIONAL ... id=1&pid=1
https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory ... 155501.jpg
https://archive.org/details/Finger1980D ... 1/mode/2up
https://ia902802.us.archive.org/8/items ... %20(4).jpg
La Star: https://archive.vn/B9mEu/97b47c7e983039 ... 913924.jpg
This hit piece tried to completely clear Eberles of all accusations but in my view it failed to do so by mentioning stories of child sex abuse being sent to Finger magazine:
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/vo ... 2.htm#en21Finger rejected the slick editorial trappings of standard sex magazines in exchange for non-commissioned articles, illustrations, and photographs by readers describing their sexual fantasies and histories. Professional models, photographers, and writers were rarely used, according to Moritz, and readers' stories were printed as received, complete with typos and misspellings.
The sexual subject matter of those articles covered a wide range: heterosexuality, homosexuality, transsexuality, transvestism, bestiality, S & M, urination, and exhibitionism. Readers also occasionally sent in stories about their childhood sex experiences or fantasies with incest and pedophilia. The theme that anyone can enjoy sex without shame ran throughout its pages.