The SearchVoat Forum

The modern rejection of slavery destroyed the lives of men.

I don't agree with this man on many subjects, but I won't delete any post because I don't believe in that. Nothing faggier than the mods who interrupt actual discusion. I don't get if he's in favor of slavery (I am not), or if he's just talking about how the "slavery" narrative has deceived people and has had destructive consequences in our societies (I would agree).

If he really thinks the goal behind globalism is just international trade, he's not seeing the full picture. If this whole thing were just about money... why not resort to simpler, more efficient strategies? Why not ask for bailouts or subsidies every once in a while, bribing politicians, and getting away with it? Or being a private military contrator for a country; part of the industrial military complex? Why not just invest in new technologies, buy stock or simply resort to shady businesses? Why not just buy resource-rich terrain? Why not create "trends" so that people buy useless products, which you're selling? Why not make movies, books, art and other profitable enterprises?

No, this is about something more. If this were only about money, there would be no need to have destroyed the USSR, China and Ukraine. There would be no need to change ideologies and lifestyles. This has to be about something else. The people at the very top think of money as "no object". If you're a Rothschild, Gates, Rockefeller, Morgan, a Royal Family, etc. you don't need to look for a job, you don't need to worry about making a living. They're not running out of money any time soon. You can influence countries and continents and write history. Their life goals and ambitions adjust to that scale, like everything in life. When you're poor, you're happy to get a toy. When you're rich, one toy is not enough. This has to be about a vision, a plan, a long-term goal; a whole philosophy.

PS: Were the Protestant, American and French revolutions about money? Were the great wars about money? There is always something more.

He is assuming the biblical laws of slavery as opposed to the lawless methods which inevitably exist in all other systems, and the biblical definition of good versus evil being a war between the Devil and his followers and the followers of Almighty God.

doginventer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 27, 2021 8:25 pm He is assuming the biblical laws of slavery as opposed to the lawless methods which inevitably exist in all other systems, and the biblical definition of good versus evil being a war between the Devil and his followers and the followers of Almighty God.

As in Leviticus? That's indentured debt servitude which allows the master to beat his slave (even to death)

20 And if a man smite his bondman, or his bondwoman, with a rod, and he die under his hand, he shall surely be punished.
21 Notwithstanding if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished; for he is his money

Exodus 21:20-21

1 Masters, give unto your servants that which is just and equal; knowing that ye also have a Master in heaven.
Colossians 4 KJV

8 Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free.

9 And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.
Ephesians 6 KJV

12 Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Matthew 7 KJV

We already know that the great reset is partially about bringing back slavery through technology.
Making the lives of everyone involved more miserable. The masks really are about submission and slavery.
You want us to think you'll make good masters and our lives will all be better if we just submit.
We saw what life was like before your pets showed up and destroyed our cities.
Letting them loose was as much a part of the plan as putting shackles on them.