Page 1 of 1

Proof?

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 5:32 am
by TheRealSkeptic5000
Image

He'll probably come back with a link to "science shows we should all socialize through videochat", "no difference between virtual and real socializing, experts say"

Re: Proof?

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:59 am
by MrPim
Online socialization means I can only wish death upon niggerfaggotkiketards.

Re: Proof?

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:41 pm
by TheGreatWhiteHope
Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

Re: Proof?

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2021 1:06 pm
by TheRealSkeptic5000
TheGreatWhiteHope wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:41 pm Do you have a source on that?

Source?
Yikes.

oh sweet summer child, who hurt you? alright let's unpack.

This. so much this.

Re: Proof?

Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:57 am
by 2017Fallout
TheGreatWhiteHope wrote: Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:41 pm Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
This is a thing of beauty. Thank you