The SearchVoat Forum

papaD wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:10 am heres the misdirect

Here's the point:

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:28 pm I need to design rules that can be enforced without reference to personal point of view. Every rule in the world has edge cases that almost everyone will disapprove of. But it is more valuable to have a rule which is rigid and clear, than to have one which is open to personal interpretation by whomever happens to be in charge today.

That's why I'm putting so much thought into this. I'm not trying to win.

papaD wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:10 am

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:09 am

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 12:16 am

Your argument is persuasive. Let me think about that.

Hmm where to draw the line. What if I just have poor opsec? What if I post a picture of my backyard and some 4chan autist locates it like they did Shia LeBoeuf's flag? Still thinking...

heres the misdirect

Exactly. What if he's just a pedo that has been found out?

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:42 pm

antiliberalsociety wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:43 pm This right here:

It's US legal, so by my rule it's permitted here

is what makes you a lying hypocritical scum bag. You know what else is US legal?

Sharing personal information voluntarily uploaded to the internet.

Ok, good point. Not everything that is US legal is permitted here. But I'm pretty sure sharing personal information, however acquired, is US legal too, so why any rules against doxxing at all?

Exactly. Why?

Your prior argument that it's necessary to protect free speech doesn't hold up. Anyone who's been doxed can create a new account and express their thoughts without any identity/stigma attached.

All the no doxxing rules accomplish is protecting a username from blowback; whether rightly or wrongly deserved.

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:09 am

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 12:16 am

antiliberalsociety wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:54 pm If it's acquired through hacking or breaching data privacy (IE what @The_Venerable did to @fightknightHERO the kike that he is) then it should be disallowed. But the second they spill their own shit - it's on them. Just like your details are on you.

Your argument is persuasive. Let me think about that.

Hmm where to draw the line. What if I just have poor opsec? What if I post a picture of my backyard and some 4chan autist locates it like they did Shia LeBoeuf's flag? Still thinking...

You learn your lesson and improve your opsec? Anything else coddles people into a false sense of security.

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:15 am

papaD wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:10 am heres the misdirect

Here's the point:

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:28 pm I need to design rules that can be enforced without reference to personal point of view. Every rule in the world has edge cases that almost everyone will disapprove of. But it is more valuable to have a rule which is rigid and clear, than to have one which is open to personal interpretation by whomever happens to be in charge today.

That's why I'm putting so much thought into this. I'm not trying to win.

What are your boundaries, i.e. edge cases? Do you have any and are you the best person to decide (nevermind that you are in the position to be the only person to decide)?

Is it permitted for people to be posting grooming advice for their pedo friends on how to successfully molest children?

Is it permitted for pedos to share cp links/websites with or without secret passwords?

If someone is a convicted child rapist, and it's discovered that they are on this site bragging about it, can they be called out by name if their identity is public record and people figure out that it's them?

Is it permitted for pedos to discuss personal details including name and location, photos of children they want to molest or have molested? Are they protected by SVF privacy rule in the pedo playground subs?

Geezus these are all good questions. I’m out for a few hours but will come back to this

The one main question I have that no one else has asked after a week is why is he hiding and using a couple of his known alts on talk.lol ? After he doxed himself I think he has been receiving multiple threats to be honest. A few people have called him out on his alts. Last night a dormant account was activated on loli. Another possible alt account ? This is the kind shit he brings to any site. On the defunct "goatpen" site he was called out by a few sbbh members who described him as being gabara level weird. Personally I think he is scared shitless at this point. Karma is a wild animal and it's hungry. Hi shitbaggery is catching up to him or has caught up to him. This is all he brings to any site he shows up on.

Thisismyaccount wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 11:54 am The one main question I have that no one else has asked after a week is why is he hiding and using a couple of his known alts on talk.lol ? After he doxed himself I think he has been receiving multiple threats to be honest. A few people have called him out on his alts. Last night a dormant account was activated on loli. Another possible alt account ? This is the kind shit he brings to any site. On the defunct "goatpen" site he was called out by a few sbbh members who described him as being gabara level weird. Personally I think he is scared shitless at this point. Karma is a wild animal and it's hungry. Hi shitbaggery is catching up to him or has caught up to him. This is all he brings to any site he shows up on.

He struck a (((deal))) to keep posting his kikery pedo shit and silence whistle blowers in return for not trolling SVF or using his confession SV made in his own sub. That's the only reason.

"Sexually suggestive material involving minors" basically means legal pedo shit: loli drawings, non-sexual photos of naked underage girls (like the "hands up" photo), suggestive photos of clothed children, text stories about child sexual abuse, all that kind of stuff. It's US legal, so by my rule it's permitted here, even though 99% of users find it disgusting.

Pornography and obscenity are not constitutionally protected, pretty sure child nudity is a pretty big no no that would be a good way for the feds to take the website down (if they weren't pedos themselves).