Voat.xyz is another Ruqqus - I was just banned for criticizing system, aka The_Venerable lol

[MadWorld]

It would be even more hilarious if that comment got inflated by 10,000 points, because xyz does not have sticky comments

[antiliberalsociety]

It would be even more hilarious if that comment got inflated by 10,000 points, because xyz does not have sticky comments

Well unlike this post



He doesn't want this getting any attention. @chrimony is kicking his ass in that thread lol.

[blumen4alles]

I've seen those, they didn't go over well at goatpen.

No you didn't - I just made them.

As far as my post at goatpen (https://preview.goatpen.co/post/4876) I really don't care what others think of what I said. I think I am right. I know I am right. The only issue Cynabuns had with my Voat post is that it included the original cover for Nevermind in a collage - and the collage was just to show readers that Nirvana baby has recreated the cover several times. All she wanted me to do was remove the link for the collage because it featured the Nevermind cover which is currently being sued over. But I wasn't on my computer and didn't see those comments until the next morning. Monitoring and recording Voat activity isn't one of my hobbies like it is yours. What a life you had copying chat logs.

Thanks for archiving my Voat post btw, I assume you did that. Saved me some trouble recreating it.

I saw in chat you use an Apple device. You are a special kind of retarded. Can you take a photo of the stickers you have on your Mac to help it run faster?

[antiliberalsociety]

I will respond to comments in that thread in this comment here and I will edit in new comments as they come.

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=612e6c95e26c3



First of all, the overt use of alts on this site is very suspect. It's allowed as long as it's the Kiddie Clique. Anyone deemed SBBH by AOU's little sister gets shoa'd. So to respond to this alt's comment (I know who's it is but I won't divulge just yet)

1. How is telling the truth making drama?
2. People troll and threat and post shady porn all day, use alts to fluff their own pieces and smite their adversaries, yet that's not considered making drama?
3. Telling the truth is bad faith? Well then, you are too for accidentally telling the truth on yourself.
4. Who said anything about SBBH? Why is that always the go-to?
5. Telling the truth is "forcing censorship"? Truth fears no investigation.
6. If you are that worried about chat being saved, what are you into that's leading to this paranoia?
7. Why do you support censorship? What is it about a free speech environment that you don't like?

[ - ] blumen4alles 6 points 1 hour ago (+6/-0)
I doubt system banned ALS for anything he said in a comment to system. I wouldn't say Ven is "hiding behind" the username system either. If anything it lets new users know he runs this site.

Except he did per the link provided and his own admission. Why would he have to "let users know who runs this site" by hiding behind a generic handle? That sounds like Little Man Syndrome, not specifying.

ALS harasses users constantly to the point where they delete their accounts and runs a continual campaign of harassment in general.

Wow, someone fears truth being told on them. 1. There was only 1 user and he deleted because he was banned, I have that documented in this very post. 2. Say, speaking of harassment... Remember the time you made up outrageous lies about me from a sub you banned me from so I couldn't respond?



And remember the time you said you admire SBBH tactics of doing just that? Remember how you admitted using alts?



Projection and deflection is your only defense. You cry out in pain as you harass people.

He has some serious mental issues.

Truth tellers usually do in the eyes of criminals.

There have been plenty of users here that have criticized system, including myself. I don't think Ven/system is anything like AOU.

He protects your criminality and takes part in it, of course you'd say that. Also, your staged theater of good cop/bad cop is documented in my other thread.

[ - ] blumen4alles 1 point 1 hour ago (+3/-2)
ALS was crying about my post because it featured the cover of Nirvana - Nevermind and ALS the closet pedophile thinks naked babies are sexually arousing.

Cute lie and projection.

1. I never mentioned that post other than it was theater to create the illusion that you aren't exempt from the rules, I predicted it ahead of time. That post didn't even exist yet at the time of that chat, so nice disinfo.

2. You and the Kiddie Clique are the only ones using that term. You keep repeating it as if the more it is repeated, it will become truth...

If that Nirvana cover is kiddie porn, then imagine how many people in the 90's had kiddie porn in their homes, cars, offices, etc. Nevermind was the first CD I ever owned - fuck anyone that says a naked baby is CP. As Kurt said:


"If you're offended by this, you must be a closet pedophile."

Citing jew media exonerates your pedo posting? Also, the only one talking about the Nevermind album is you, repeatedly, like a broken record, like I even mentioned it beyond your child fixation issue. Total and obvious deflection from the fact you posted porn of an adult woman and child.

I didn't agree with the SBBH ban,

Because it didn't effect you or most of people I proved to be actual SBBH. I exposed that lie in my collage.

I think users like dial and ALS are a much bigger problem here, but it isn't my site.

Could have fooled me with how you get your way 100% of the time. Whistleblowers are indeed a threat in your world, that much is clear.

Users who were vote manipulating were given warnings before banning.

Which was never proven, no transparency or consistency was ever implemented.

I know how much and how long ALS has harassed me, it gets old. ALS just keeps pushing and pushing though.

Crying out in pain as they say. Who was the one that got banned for speaking his mind and telling the truth? Until you and all your alts are banned, you can't complain.

[ - ] fightknightHERO 2 points 11 minutes ago (+2/-0)
Oh yeah... he is definitely power tripping
https://files.catbox.moe/a3k95h.png

i know he pestered system quite a bit these days but this is too much
i hope system reconsiders, yes he's whines a lot but he contributed a lot of good content to this site
not to mention his service while being on Ruqqus...

it's always a black day to see national socialists turning on each other...

They aren't National Socialists. It's been a fraud all along. He stole the Voat username just to get a userbase. It was a bait & switch.

[ - ] Cynabuns 0 points 16 minutes ago (+0/-0)
Bad faith actor indeed.

Against what? All I did was tell the truth on people, including yourself. How is that a bad thing unless it exposes your corruption?

[ - ] mikenigger 0 points 6 minutes ago (+0/-0)*
The fact that you have a screenshot of ALS in action tells me you're feigning ignorance about this whole situation.

Comments chains like that were repeated dozens of times with system, cynabuns and other users, he would come back the next day and do it again to the same users.

Oh, kind of like dial did, whom "system" promoted as a mod to "have fun"? That after he banned him? No one complained harder about my exposing pedophilic behavior more than mikenigger, SavageHenry, Blumen4pedos, and The_Venerable. I wonder why........

[ - ] mikenigger 0 points 10 minutes ago (+0/-0)

" HURR IT WAS DEFINITELY THAT!!"


you're completely unaware of what ALS was doing for the last few weeks and now you want to single out one instance as the sole reason for the ban.

I told the truth and exposed hypocrisy, lies, and blatant bias by the admins. Crime of the century.

[ - ] try -3 points 2 hours ago (+2/-5)*
By finally banning that hyper-zealot enemy of 100% free speech, my respect for you and your work went up another 10% for you system.

So, I can't even begin to break down his mile long paste of irrelevant false equivalencies, so I'll summarize. In the same breath he calls system a hero for banning my speech, he called me an enemy of free speech. He supported the picture Blumen4pedos had deleted because it contained underaged nude girls. "Nudity is not porn!!!" he said. So, go figure why he's defending the censorship of those calling it out. Porn is not free speech. Nudity is not free speech. And it fits the profile of a pedophile defined by counselors working with convicted sex offenders.



When you compare the rationale of everyone resisting my speech on the matter, you'll notice it fits this same exact pattern. The mental gymnastics involved to justify it is awe inspiring.

[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 39 minutes ago (+1/-0)
How the fuck did I miss this thread?

I called this a week ago: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?posti ... ef9e353e19

ALS is a faggot troll, all he did was push people's buttons. He's solely responsible for SavageHenry quitting this site and was on B4A's ass for weeks, concern trolling in chat and threads about a 2 month old post nobody gave a fuck about.

So, telling the truth and persistence of truth = faggot troll? SavageHenry was exposed as a pedophile in my collage, setting him off in the first place. If he nuked his accounts, that's on his own dumb ass.

He was warned multiple times,

No, I was warned once to "drop it" because wrongspeak.

he even got a 24h timeout for shitting up chat with his trolling. AFAIK he was only here to do damage and contributed the bare minimum to blend in.

Truth = damage, exposing hypocrisy and bias = shitting up the chat? Hmm, makes one question his motives and source of his anger...

You must be one of those "fuck drama" people that ignored everything he did and now you're all surprised he's banned.

Yet, you were the ones saying "fuck drama" when it was pointed your way. How many times did you claim to speak for the entire site, saying "no one cares"? Well, if no one cared why couldn't they just ignore it like they do with Dial? If my posts were just trolls, why did it garner such a hostile reaction from the Kiddie Clique and the admins?

Are you also mad that you were exposed as fitting that profile?

[ - ] Cynabuns 0 points 1 hour ago (+0/-0)
It's been troubling to see how AOU handles things but in the instance of ALS I believe he crossed a line after multiple requests to stop.

There's been multiple requests for consistent enforcement of rules to no avail, met with blatant hostility and abuse from your keeper. It's to be expected when you advertise a free speech platform only to silence dissenters.

I think that some libel was entering the picture but that's just my take on things.

You guys refused to even acknowledge my truth collage, let alone challenge it. All you had was ad hominem. It was comprised of your own words. Libel indicates falsehoods, where did I ever lie about it? Show me.

"that he should just focus on the software side and leave decisions like bans up to you, as you seemed more even-keeled and less prone to banning on a whim. "


That is high praise, chrimony, thank you, but moot since I have no power.
Cheers.

Liar. Tell me, who banned SavageHenry then had the power to reverse it?

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?posti ... 52369cd7ea

7:01pm Cynabuns I lifted SavageHenry's temp ban this morning after remembering that ALS had done a number on him the other day, I figured he was just lashing out at everyone so I gave him a break

(After multiple requests to stop?) Interesting how fast he got a reversal. He attacked you guys worse than I did lol. You really seem to fear dirty laundry being aired out...

Who deleted a post over legality claims?

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?posti ... 8686fec83b

It's pretty clear you have plenty of power, don't try to minimize it.

[antiliberalsociety]

I've seen those, they didn't go over well at goatpen.

No you didn't - I just made them.

As far as my post at goatpen (https://preview.goatpen.co/post/4876) I really don't care what others think of what I said. I think I am right. I know I am right.

That's what most pedophiles and criminal think.

The only issue Cynabuns had with my Voat post is that it included the original cover for Nevermind in a collage - and the collage was just to show readers that Nirvana baby has recreated the cover several times. All she wanted me to do was remove the link for the collage because it featured the Nevermind cover which is currently being sued over. But I wasn't on my computer and didn't see those comments until the next morning.

Has nothing to do with the topic at hand, it's covered under fair use and that was total theater. You didn't get a time out for it though, did you... Not even a warning.

Monitoring and recording Voat activity isn't one of my hobbies like it is yours. What a life you had copying chat logs.

Funny, you have no trouble digging up a plethora of archive and searchvote content to support your side when the time comes...

Thanks for archiving my Voat post btw, I assume you did that. Saved me some trouble recreating it.

I didn't, and I don't know who did.

I saw in chat you use an Apple device. You are a special kind of retarded. Can you take a photo of the stickers you have on your Mac to help it run faster?

Hmm, and you say I have mental issues for collecting info...

[blumen4alles]

"ALS closet pedo" is the new "dial gay."

Where is my picture of your Mac? I know you have stickers on it.

[antiliberalsociety]

"ALS closet pedo" is the new "dial gay."

Where is my picture of your Mac? I know you have stickers on it.

Nice deflection. Answer me this, how do you explain fitting the profile of a pedophile defined by counselors working with sex criminals?

[mikenigger]

LOL get fucked, kike.

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=60c3ffd26a097

[antiliberalsociety]

LOL get fucked, kike.

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=60c3ffd26a097

WTF does that post have to do with anything? lol You can't survive without a safe space shielding you from microtransgressions. Good thing system protects you from hurt feelings by censoring alternate views

But, this isn't the warm, fuzzy, soft green zone of fake voat. So, same question goes for you.

How do you explain fitting the profile of a pedophile as defined by counselors that work with convicted sex offenders?

[MadWorld]

Your profile says you are still banned. But you were able to comment. Was it because you were still logged in on the device? You better file a bug report to /v/VoatDev or /v/ReportJewsAndBugs

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=612e6c95e26c3

Antiliberalsociety 0 points 3 hours ago (+0/-0)
Congrats comrade, you kicked their asses lol. Fuck this fraudulent website that plagiarized the Voat name.

chrimony 0 points 10 minutes ago (+0/-0)
Welcome back? Says you're banned still when I click on your account. Did they let you back on only to ban you right away again?