The SearchVoat Forum

T-bitty wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:56 am

tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:17 am Words are not cp. A public, 100% legal photo drawn from jewgle is not cp. Accusations are not proof of cp.

Try harder.

Dumbfags like you enjoy freedoms others fought to give you, for you to turn around and throw it away.

Okay but why did you want to post a grown man making out with a little girl (assuming that's true)? Also porn/obscenities aren't protected by the first amendment, I forget the judge's name but he described those things as "I know it when I see it." If the legal system wasn't run by pedos itself that could get the website taken down, from a legal standpoint it isn't protected speech. So no one has fought for your freedom to post that, unless you count WW2 when Americans fought the Nazis to make the world safe for degeneracy.

Also something being on Google doesn't mean it's legal, I doubt they vet cp. In fact I bet they promote it.

>joogle

Search father daughter kiss. What part of that is "illegal" & "cp". Stop being played by these moralfags. The point is to accuse. I'm done with you. You have to learn on your own what the fight is, who is silencing us into extinction.

Look around you. Lockdowns. Vaccine passports. Deletion for dissent. You think I give a shit about joogle images, you are one dumb faggot.

I saw those posts and they were gross and vulgar. It wasn't just that one, it was every single post you made after your introduction post. Calling some guy a chad while he's posing with clearly underage girls in bikinis isn't technically cp, but toeing the line is just what kikes do, just so they can push the envelope further. Fuck out of here with your false victimhood bullshit.

tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:37 am

T-bitty wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:56 am

tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:17 am Words are not cp. A public, 100% legal photo drawn from jewgle is not cp. Accusations are not proof of cp.

Try harder.

Dumbfags like you enjoy freedoms others fought to give you, for you to turn around and throw it away.

Okay but why did you want to post a grown man making out with a little girl (assuming that's true)? Also porn/obscenities aren't protected by the first amendment, I forget the judge's name but he described those things as "I know it when I see it." If the legal system wasn't run by pedos itself that could get the website taken down, from a legal standpoint it isn't protected speech. So no one has fought for your freedom to post that, unless you count WW2 when Americans fought the Nazis to make the world safe for degeneracy.

Also something being on Google doesn't mean it's legal, I doubt they vet cp. In fact I bet they promote it.

>joogle

Search father daughter kiss. What part of that is "illegal" & "cp". Stop being played by these moralfags. The point is to accuse. I'm done with you. You have to learn on your own what the fight is, who is silencing us into extinction.

Look around you. Lockdowns. Vaccine passports. Deletion for dissent. You think I give a shit about joogle images, you are one dumb faggot.

The court case was about a lewd movie, not swearing.

You argued because it was on Google it should be allowed on the other website, I pointed out Google doesn't vet illegal imagery and it has the money to make the Feds ignore them. I get the impression it wasn't just a sweet picture, if that's the case why would you want to post it? To test if a website that is probably already hated by the Feds would protect your post that isn't legally protected speech? That sounds like a dumb thing to do.

Jews who peddle pornography? I fail to see how you being unable to exercise your desire to post a picture that isn't protected speech plays into their hand.

tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:26 am
You're full of shit. Your ilk is what destroys, while pointing your finger elsewhere.

It would not have stayed and you know it, probably better than anyone.

You originally struck me as kind of a smart guy. Posting sexually suggestive images of children isn't smart anywhere. Indeed, it is your ilk that destroys.

TheGreatWhiteHope wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:43 am I saw those posts and they were gross and vulgar. It wasn't just that one, it was every single post you made after your introduction post. Calling some guy a chad while he's posing with clearly underage girls in bikinis isn't technically cp, but toeing the line is just what kikes do, just so they can push the envelope further. Fuck out of here with your false victimhood bullshit.

>gross & vulgur

Well, go piss in the wind bc that shit is a low bar for banning on a site claiming the voat Free Speech mantle.

>toeing the line

Gee golly, don't go near the boundaries! Accident or on purpose. Your asinine accusation is exactly the pc arguments that have eroded us into these shrinking puddles of rights. Push back bc they will not stop until you are dead and gone.

I realize people are coming from varied experiences. If you've never been accused of made up shit, silenced, mobbed, shunned for your individual thoughts and speech, I can't yell it into you to experience or witness. But neither can nor will I forget. You don't know freedom and life until you have it taken away - by dutiful moralfag nannies like cynabuns.
This country and world is falling apart, exactly bc of these moralfag cowards you rely on to "protect" you.

I'm done with you, good luck. I got emails to write.

TheGreatWhiteHope wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:43 am ...toeing the line is just what kikes do, just so they can push the envelope further. Fuck out of here with your false victimhood bullshit.

Exactly. They walk right up to the line to either try and push it just a little bit further, or get someone to do something they can scream "oppression" over.

uvulectomy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:13 am

TheGreatWhiteHope wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:43 am ...toeing the line is just what kikes do, just so they can push the envelope further. Fuck out of here with your false victimhood bullshit.

Exactly. They walk right up to the line to either try and push it just a little bit further, or get someone to do something they can scream "oppression" over.

But that's not done 24/7 from the other direction? Are you brain dead? Look where you're posting. In some backwater site. Try writing nigger kike faggot on any mainstream site. You are here bc people are not pushing back. You are here bc you rely on vile nanny mods to protect you from "bad people".

Go ahead, worm. I see you going through and downvoting. You're not worth my time until you start fighting back.

>Us
There is no us. There is voat, then there's you in your own corner: shitting the place up with your pedokikery. The reason you're alone is because nobody likes pedos except for other pedos. Fuck of back to Tel Aviv: where, I'm sure, you will be welcomed with open arms.

>Moralfag
t. jew

tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:26 am

uvulectomy wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:13 am

TheGreatWhiteHope wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:43 am ...toeing the line is just what kikes do, just so they can push the envelope further. Fuck out of here with your false victimhood bullshit.

Exactly. They walk right up to the line to either try and push it just a little bit further, or get someone to do something they can scream "oppression" over.

But that's not done 24/7 from the other direction? Are you brain dead? Look where you're posting. In some backwater site. Try writing nigger kike faggot on any mainstream site. You are here bc people are not pushing back. You are here bc you rely on vile nanny mods to protect you from "bad people".

Go ahead, worm. I see you going through and downvoting. You're not worth my time until you start fighting back.

If this and .xyz are such backwaters, why are you so damn insistent that you be allowed to peddle your filth? Why is it so important that you be able to post what you do?

Actually, I don't want to know. I just want you to gas yourself.

The major problem with suppressing things that are legal, like was done in this case (if it was done, site is down, no way to confirm), is that it opens up precedent to suppress other things, that are legal, too. On Voat, putt once banned Aged or who it was and the community pushed back hard and eventually he was unbanned. Voat even had a dedicated subverse for drawn porn of children. That's just the kinda place Voat was. There was freedom for everything that's legal, which drawn porn of children is.

You don't have to like it and you can ban it, but then the site is no different from reddit or poal, just with a different flavor of allowed opinions. If that's the direction it's heading in, I'll be out, just like I left poal. I want the possibility to encounter opinions I do not like. I can circle-jerk on my own.