Are you allowed to be within 500 feet of said niece given your current charges and court order?SearchVoat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 2:24 amAre pictures of my niece at her preschool graduation sexually suggestive? They might be, if you're perverted enough.
SVF Rule Change
- antiliberalsociety
- Posts: 2633
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 3394
- Reply points (CCP): 4462
Re: SVF Rule Change
- kestrel9
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 1943
- Reply points (CCP): 2881
Re: SVF Rule Change
Correct, any photo of children can be arousing to pedos. That's why I never post pictures of children, not because there's anything wrong with the photos, but because of the asshole pedos on this site.SearchVoat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 2:24 amAre pictures of my niece at her preschool graduation sexually suggestive? They might be, if you're perverted enough.
Last edited by kestrel9 on Fri Sep 02, 2022 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- SearchVoat
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 298
- Reply points (CCP): 795
Re: SVF Rule Change
So you understand the problem. Where to draw the line when someone turns up and simply wants to proudly share photos of his loving family. Do we ban all photos of children? Greta Thunberg?
- kestrel9
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 1943
- Reply points (CCP): 2881
Re: SVF Rule Change
I would find it hard to believe that anyone here is posting photos of their loving family. But no, we don't have to ban all photos of children, just don't have pedo subverses. If you allow pedo subs then the TOS must announce that people who don't want pedos to fap over their kids' family photos shouldn't post them. Photos of Greta Thunberg might be helpful to keep pedos away /sSearchVoat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 2:38 amSo you understand the problem. Where to draw the line when someone turns up and simply wants to proudly share photos of his loving family. Do we ban all photos of children? Greta Thunberg?
Last edited by kestrel9 on Fri Sep 02, 2022 2:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 pm
- Topic points (SCP): 3702
- Reply points (CCP): 5606
Re: SVF Rule Change
Those 2 photos he posted in chat had sexually suggestive captions though, let's not forget that. Or the "hands up" photo link that he posted on Aug 8th that you removed and warned him about. Having seen the stuff, he has posted on talk.lol firsthand he is not to be trusted. Our experience with him and his perversions has taught us to be wary of him.
- SearchVoat
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 298
- Reply points (CCP): 795
Re: SVF Rule Change
they've already gone.
they've gone too.Thisismyaccount wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 3:03 am Those 2 photos he posted in chat had sexually suggestive captions though, let's not forget that. Or the "hands up" photo link that he posted on Aug 8th
We won't have a problem with b4a, I'm just pondering about how the rule will work moving forward.
- MadWorld
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 1276
- Reply points (CCP): 2987
Re: SVF Rule Change
The image of group nudity with minors in it is nothing to b4p. He finds this type of images all the time. Of course, it is not his fault that those images just come to him. /sThisismyaccount wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 3:03 am Those 2 photos he posted in chat had sexually suggestive captions though, let's not forget that. Or the "hands up" photo link that he posted on Aug 8th that you removed and warned him about. Having seen the stuff, he has posted on talk.lol firsthand he is not to be trusted. Our experience with him and his perversions has taught us to be wary of him.
- SearchVoat
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 298
- Reply points (CCP): 795
Re: SVF Rule Change
Reminds me I should tag him so he doesn't have the excuse that he didn't see the rule change, but you wouldn't try that, would you @blumen4alles?SearchVoat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 3:21 am We won't have a problem with b4a, I'm just pondering about how the rule will work moving forward.
- antiliberalsociety
- Posts: 2633
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 3394
- Reply points (CCP): 4462
Re: SVF Rule Change
It's okay on [enter site] and it's legal in the US, so it should be okay here too amirite.MadWorld wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:01 amThe image of group nudity with minors in it is nothing to b4p. He finds this type of images all the time. Of course, it is not his fault that those images just come to him. /sThisismyaccount wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 3:03 am Those 2 photos he posted in chat had sexually suggestive captions though, let's not forget that. Or the "hands up" photo link that he posted on Aug 8th that you removed and warned him about. Having seen the stuff, he has posted on talk.lol firsthand he is not to be trusted. Our experience with him and his perversions has taught us to be wary of him.
- blumen4alles
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): -22
- Reply points (CCP): -222
- Location: ALS's Mind
Re: SVF Rule Change
HELL NOSearchVoat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:11 amReminds me I should tag him so he doesn't have the excuse that he didn't see the rule change, but you wouldn't try that, would you @blumen4alles?SearchVoat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 3:21 am We won't have a problem with b4a, I'm just pondering about how the rule will work moving forward.