voat.xyz user created verses that attack users for not being a part of it hivemind and calling it "immunity"

[Deleted User 149584]

seriously, these fuckers are no worse than cancel culture people, and systems new ccp restrictions will limit any one with a outside opinion or anyone that the voat retards dont like.

and the only reason these tards can survive is because they have a ciclejerk of people to upvote them non stop

this is just one example

https://www.voat.xyz/v/Voatstapo

at least real voat had sometime to build a userbase before all these "voat immunity" retards came in. I fucking told you, this will be 100 times worse than voat ever was. And so far everyone of predictions on where this shit hole will end up, has happened

what a free speech site you got there

[chrimony]

seriously, these fuckers are no worse than cancel culture people, and systems new ccp restrictions will limit any one with a outside opinion or anyone that the voat retards dont like.

Even with a negative reputation, you can still post a story or a comment every 5 minutes. That's plenty.

[toobaditworks]

Hi,

I read that you can log into voat.xyz using our names from voat is that true? If so how do I get my name to transfer over to there?

[Cynabuns]

Hi,

I read that you can log into voat.xyz using our names from voat is that true? If so how do I get my name to transfer over to there?

Your name is red here so you're legit! Register at new voat and see if your name is taken. If not, you're good to go. If someone has taken your name, send a PM here in searchvoat.co forum to The_Venerable and tell him you'd like your name on new voat.

[Deleted User 5341]

seriously, these fuckers are no worse than cancel culture people, and systems new ccp restrictions will limit any one with a outside opinion or anyone that the voat retards dont like.

Even with a negative reputation, you can still post a story or a comment every 5 minutes. That's plenty.

You would say the same thing if they banned everyone who didn't toe the line entirely, just admit it, what you WANT is for a retarded echo chamber... let me guess? Ban all the shills like Paul_Neri and @Tallest_Skil and Helena(whatever she uses now) too? Lol

[TheWholeTruth]

seriously, these fuckers are no worse than cancel culture people, and systems new ccp restrictions will limit any one with a outside opinion or anyone that the voat retards dont like.

Even with a negative reputation, you can still post a story or a comment every 5 minutes. That's plenty.

Fuck off. Quit supporting censorship.

[toobaditworks]

Hi,

I read that you can log into voat.xyz using our names from voat is that true? If so how do I get my name to transfer over to there?

Your name is red here so you're legit! Register at new voat and see if your name is taken. If not, you're good to go. If someone has taken your name, send a PM here in searchvoat.co forum to The_Venerable and tell him you'd like your name on new voat.

Thanks!!

[chrimony]

You would say the same thing if they banned everyone who didn't toe the line entirely, just admit it, what you WANT is for a retarded echo chamber... let me guess? Ban all the shills like Paul_Neri and @Tallest_Skil and Helena(whatever she uses now) too? Lol

No, I wouldn't. I criticized AOU when he banned a user for calling out Catholics the way Jews are routinely called out. I questioned AOU when Tallest was banned. I spoke out against arbitrary bannings by voat.xyz.

Just because I don't think you should be allowed to post questionably legal Lolita smut doesn't mean all I want is an echo chamber. But any forum does need some way to deal with people who spam disruptive content -- ideally, it's the users who control that. Ultimately, we move to a decentralized system where the users are in charge of what they see.

[Deleted User 5341]

You would say the same thing if they banned everyone who didn't toe the line entirely, just admit it, what you WANT is for a retarded echo chamber... let me guess? Ban all the shills like Paul_Neri and @Tallest_Skil and Helena(whatever she uses now) too? Lol

No, I wouldn't. I criticized AOU when he banned a user for calling out Catholics the way Jews are routinely called out. I questioned AOU when Tallest was banned. I spoke out against arbitrary bannings by voat.xyz.

Just because I don't think you should be allowed to post questionably legal Lolita smut doesn't mean all I want is an echo chamber. But any forum does need some way to deal with people who spam disruptive content -- ideally, it's the users who control that. Ultimately, we move to a decentralized system where the users are in charge of what they see.

Oh yes, the horrible lolis, I forgot, you are only allowed to post middle aged women with giant tits otherwise they could be under 18! (oh god!)
Enjoy your pathetic copium den you pathetic niggerfaggot.

[chrimony]

Oh yes, the horrible lolis, I forgot, you are only allowed to post middle aged women with giant tits otherwise they could be under 18! (oh god!)
Enjoy your pathetic copium den you pathetic niggerfaggot.

Enjoy your pathetic pedophile cartoon copium, pedo kike.