@The_Venerable (System) exposed for Vote Manipulation

[shewhomustbeobeyed]

But... but... MUH DICK

Yep, I was right. The WRONG HEAD.

Btw, you never answered my question. Which just goes to show you're a whiny little pusssy, incapable of ever attracting a mate.
what a loser.

[Deleted User 5341]

But... but... MUH DICK

Yep, I was right. The WRONG HEAD.

Btw, you never answered my question. Which just goes to show you're a whiny little pusssy, incapable of ever attracting a mate.
what a loser.

You never posed a question you boomoid faggot

[chrimony]

You never posed a question you boomoid faggot

I did, and you never answered it, despite being called out on it:

None of you people read or understand Nietzsche, Hitler, Pierce or Evola, none of you people are capable of using even the most basic logic or common sense, you people are barely better at the end of the day than shitlibs, niggers (all blacks are niggers) and Qtards.

Uh huh. Do you think those fellers would approve of you insisting on posting degenerate anime lolita?

[shewhomustbeobeyed]

You never posed a question you boomoid faggot

Yes i did.

Where does it say he was testing vote manipulation, and why shouldn't he do it? Do you know where the votes came from? Why does it matter?

U Lying Cunt.

[Deleted User 5341]

You never posed a question you boomoid faggot

I did, and you never answered it, despite being called out on it:

None of you people read or understand Nietzsche, Hitler, Pierce or Evola, none of you people are capable of using even the most basic logic or common sense, you people are barely better at the end of the day than shitlibs, niggers (all blacks are niggers) and Qtards.

Uh huh. Do you think those fellers would approve of you insisting on posting degenerate anime lolita?

Why should I ever answer your question when you don't answer mine and instead deflect towards a personal attack?
In regards to their views on lolita, they would be disgusted by anything to do with nig cuck shit while they would see nothing wrong with a White man having sex and marrying younger White girls.
You people are retarded faggots that don't even understand your own history.
It was literally legal to fuck 12 year olds in most of Europe and America before the mid 1800s when Christcucks and Jews and shitlibs started whining about "girls rights" and "childrens rights" and "nigger rights" and oy vey we gotta get those White people to not breed and cuck!

[memik]

~+~+~+~+~+~AUTISM INTERVENTION~+~+~+~+~+~

knock it off

[chrimony]

Why should I ever answer your question when you don't answer mine and instead deflect towards a personal attack?

What question of yours have I not answered? You accuse everybody else of not being up to standards, and evoke figures from history. It's only fair that we hold the mirror up to you to see how you measure up.

In regards to their views on lolita, they would be disgusted by anything to do with nig cuck shit while they would see nothing wrong with a White man having sex and marrying younger White girls.

BULL SHIT. They'd be disgusted by you fixating on images of underage girls in cartoon form while supposedly fighting for his people. Yeah, because that's the big problem with white society -- not enough older men sexualizing children. Fucking degenerate.

You people are retarded faggots that don't even understand your own history.
It was literally legal to fuck 12 year olds in most of Europe and America before the mid 1800s when Christcucks and Jews and shitlibs started whining about "girls rights" and "childrens rights" and "nigger rights" and oy vey we gotta get those White people to not breed and cuck!

And it was considered normal for royalty to practice incest. That doesn't mean it's okay today. You don't need to fuck 12 year olds to breed, you dumb fuck. And just how old do you think that girl in your avatar is supposed to be? Doesn't look post-puberty to me. What kind of degenerate spends all his energy publishing his sexual desires for young children?