Well, to be entirely honest, the site owner isn't doing himself any favors here. I think a picture of an adult open mouth kissing a child is illegal -- the "I found it on Jewgle" shit doesn't fly. But by taking the stance that he thinks it wasn't illegal, he muddied the waters. Regardless, still a big fuck you for posting this kind of shit, whether it's illegal or not.tokui wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:49 pm "He definitely got what he wanted, an excuse to be angry and something to work towards. While I don't believe what he posted was illegal, it was as borderline as you could get. I didn't even ban him, I was willing to give him the chance to make a new account and start fresh. But fuck this piece of shit. They can try to cancel me all they want. But it won't stop the site. If I get cancelled again I will get another host. And another. I will self host it if I have to. You cannot stop it."
His own admission. Also, my entire acct content was also migrated, then subsequently deleted. This guy has turned out badly, he is not, imo, even mod material. Putt? He couldn't carry his shoes let alone wear them.
Source:
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=6068e46d98758
voat.xyz is not VOAT
-
chrimony
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 20
- Reply points (CCP): 173
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
-
uvulectomy
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 2
- Reply points (CCP): 20
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
It's not about what goats need or don't need, it's about what kikes do when it comes to any place that they perceive as a threat due to too much goyim knowing. And they do it because it's effective. They know that nobody wants to be associated with pedo filth. But at the same time they also know that alternative platforms are afraid of being considered "against free speech." Hence this issue being so effective. Show weakness in either direction after an accusation, and the wedge is driven in further. The only real defense is to make it known from the outset that pedo freaks are not welcome, so the community can see that any whining about censorship is almost certainly coming from a kike trying to peddle their filth.
"Expanding boundaries" toward normalizing the sexualization of children is absolutely a bad thing.
It applies pretty directly. tokui and those like him are doing exactly that. And in this case he's so butthurt he even admits he's going to do everything he can to get .xyz removed from every hosting provider he can.
Except it's not only about words or drawings. This fuck continually apologizes for a known pedophile, and acts as if the sexualization of children is perfectly normal.
Examples:
-
Tallest_Skil
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 0
- Reply points (CCP): 138
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Take note that SearchVoat dismissed my report for Tokui’s OP, despite him being an outed child pornographer.
Take note also that there is a SETTING IN THIS WEBSITE’S USER OPTIONS to enable pedo content.
Take note also that there is a SETTING IN THIS WEBSITE’S USER OPTIONS to enable pedo content.
-
Wahaha
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 0
- Reply points (CCP): 55
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
I agree with the sentiment, but there is just no way to simultaneously be a free speech site while banning legal content you don't like. You can't have your cake and eat it too. There's just no way to "strike a balance". The moment you start banning people for stuff that is legal you are no longer a free speech site.
On a free speech site you downvote the spam and ignore the content you do not like. No nanny mod comes in to save you from the things you can't handle to look at. That's the point.
One of the reasons a mod might interfere I can think of is to remove things that are actually off-topic. And a ban can absolutely follow people that repeatedly post things that are clearly off-topic. But the catch is, that sexy pictures of underage video game characters is in fact on-topic in the gaming section. Which is why the Voat community reacted allergic to Age or who it was being banned for posting this stuff in v/gaming.
The stuff you linked falls under niggerfaggotry in my book. He is technically right (the best kind of right) and is met with scorn instead of with arguments.
If you get too emotional at differing viewpoints to actually argue them, then a free speech platform might not be the best option for you. Morality is a thing that changes over time. Take slavery. At some point we decided slavery might not be a good idea and at some point we might decide that it would be a good idea, after all. But if you want to argue the issue getting all offended and pointing at how things are right now isn't actually arguing at all. Of course, it might be tiring to explain to a flat earther why the earth isn't actually flat over and over again. But I don't mind examining the same issues over and over again, to be honest. Even if they are utterly stupid. Still better than banning the ones that disagree with what the world agreed on.
Also, I think that there's an argument to be made that most niggers were better off during slavery and apartheid. But try to voice it in public and see how the mob reacts.
On a free speech site you downvote the spam and ignore the content you do not like. No nanny mod comes in to save you from the things you can't handle to look at. That's the point.
One of the reasons a mod might interfere I can think of is to remove things that are actually off-topic. And a ban can absolutely follow people that repeatedly post things that are clearly off-topic. But the catch is, that sexy pictures of underage video game characters is in fact on-topic in the gaming section. Which is why the Voat community reacted allergic to Age or who it was being banned for posting this stuff in v/gaming.
The stuff you linked falls under niggerfaggotry in my book. He is technically right (the best kind of right) and is met with scorn instead of with arguments.
If you get too emotional at differing viewpoints to actually argue them, then a free speech platform might not be the best option for you. Morality is a thing that changes over time. Take slavery. At some point we decided slavery might not be a good idea and at some point we might decide that it would be a good idea, after all. But if you want to argue the issue getting all offended and pointing at how things are right now isn't actually arguing at all. Of course, it might be tiring to explain to a flat earther why the earth isn't actually flat over and over again. But I don't mind examining the same issues over and over again, to be honest. Even if they are utterly stupid. Still better than banning the ones that disagree with what the world agreed on.
Also, I think that there's an argument to be made that most niggers were better off during slavery and apartheid. But try to voice it in public and see how the mob reacts.
-
tokui
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): -1
- Reply points (CCP): -1
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
To anyone who feels they "know" who or what I am, know that on deddit I am a "black man".Tallest_Skil wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:39 am Take note that SearchVoat dismissed my report for Tokui’s OP, despite him being an outed child pornographer.
Take note also that there is a SETTING IN THIS WEBSITE’S USER OPTIONS to enable pedo content.
You don't need to know who I am, only why I am:
/b
-
chrimony
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 20
- Reply points (CCP): 173
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
On every free speech forum under discussion that you've been on, YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE. As to "why", well either you really are a pedophile, or you are a troll. If you're the latter, you're probably a subversive kike. Or maybe all of the above, a subversive, pedo kike.
-
The_Venerable
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 64
- Reply points (CCP): 155
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
That image crossed the line. Period. I searched through your searchvoat history, and you are known for posting borderline CP. There is a difference between posting a young girl in a bikini, and posting a grown man about to open mouth kiss a young girl. The later is sexual. And that is what is boils down to. Was the image/video sexual in nature? Does it feature a minor? If the answer to both is yes then I am obligated to remove it. That is no different than voat.co, which had this in their TOS.
-
uvulectomy
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 2
- Reply points (CCP): 20
Re: voat.xyz is not VOAT
Easy enough...
Who You Are: A kike pedo shill in need of some rope.
Why You Are: Your only purpose is to cause trouble for any platform your hook-nosed masters want to target.
It's the same song and dance, EVERY. FUCKING. TIME.