Okay, now that I know it was @doginventer, and not MY Chickenbutt, that got doxxed, it's all good.kestrel9 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:09 pm Can't believe you've been here less than 3 days and already you doxxed @doginventer :lol: :lol: :lol:
For the record...
- shewhomustbeobeyed
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 246
- Reply points (CCP): 2041
Re: For the record...
- kestrel9
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 1943
- Reply points (CCP): 2881
Re: For the record...
Nah.. if anything you'll maybe get a warning, a copy of the rules, and a coupon for a McDonalds' McRib combo meal
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
- argosciv
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 70
- Reply points (CCP): 133
- shewhomustbeobeyed
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 246
- Reply points (CCP): 2041
- shewhomustbeobeyed
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 246
- Reply points (CCP): 2041
Re: For the record...
Fine! I'll send @SearchVoat extra tendies. You two work out how to divide them. OK? Just stay away from that clowncrap!
- kestrel9
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 1943
- Reply points (CCP): 2881
- doginventer
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 3353
- Reply points (CCP): 732
Re: For the record...
quietly seething.
- shewhomustbeobeyed
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 246
- Reply points (CCP): 2041
Re: For the record...
- doginventer
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 3353
- Reply points (CCP): 732
Re: For the record...
You think I’m that easy dontcha.shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 12:32 am@kestrel9 started it. @argosciv perpetuated it.
I dindumuffin! But i saved you some tendies!!!
Ok just gimme the tendies :)
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 2:58 am
- Topic points (SCP): 9
- Reply points (CCP): 6
Re: For the record...
I wouldnt be opposed to writing a book on the subject, but for now it's pure personal interest. Like I've said before I watched Voat change from a tiny reddit alt to a key component in the Trump/Q movement. I appreciate what the site used to be, was dissappointed by its fall, and became intruiged by its shrouded history and the notable users operating here.kestrel9 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:21 pm
As you can tell, @Savesequim is our most charming resident here.He did a phone interview with a vampire once (it's a play on names) and I had hoped he'd post it on his new sub so people could have a little background of the kind of research that interests him. Sadly he's chosen to remain mostly vague with ominous overtones. I spent the better half of a day looking into what he finally revealed in his posts to you (background info on the companies involved, because I like to research and it wasn't something I had been following at the time, too distracted with PG research and then Q and got sucked into major drama) but who knows what conclusions he's drawn and whether or not those are correct. Who knows what his motives are tbh. Writing a book?
Tt was very similar to FreeRepublic which had a proto-Q during the Clinton impeachment called "Quidam". Corsi, Bannon, Stone, and Breitbart were all users of that site. Their later involvement in Q leads me to believe these partisan political psyops have developed over many years and platforms.
Another example would be Pieczenik's placement in the infowars/RW podcast nexus and his promotion of Thomas Drake's Operation Greenlight, SandyHook, and the Boston bombing
Understanding how these influence campaigns operate is important to stop the inevitable censorship and deanonymization of online discourse.