Dox drama

[blumen4alles]

@blumen4alles is a stupid little shit.

Who is worse, ALS or B4A?

[blumen4alles]

Are you a pedo?

No

That is one heck of a first question. Why does it look like you are asking yourself a question, then replying to yourself? Did someone else ask you that and want their identity to be hidden or something?

[antiliberalsociety]

@blumen4alles is a stupid little shit.

Who is worse, ALS or B4A?

That's actually a good question, I want to see where she stands.

[Crensch]

It's interesting that @sguevar mentioned sQuirty. She is the best example of someone who deserved to be doxxed, outside of a pedo. She started revealing PMs and trolling PG users w/ numerous alts, from the very beginning. And the Mods of PG did nothing. Then she started doxing people. Pure Cancer. All the while she's sending nudies out to her boiz, i guess that makes her an amateur porn star. That's a pedo red flag.
She claimed to be a victim, red flag.
Married outside her race, red flag.
She said she was a into all kinds of extra-marital kinkies, red flag.
Married a 'youth pastor', that's a big red flag.
Youth pastor of a new age church, another red flag.
Never prosecuted or killed her abuser, she had access and did nothing. Biggest red flag of all.
But those cucked up mods on PG REFUSED to vet her. I begged them. We were all held hostage by that cunt.

I remind you of this because no matter how much that twat deserved every single bit of the fallout from her dox, it should not have happened.
Her doxxers are as evil as she is. imo

A good person doesn't read the 'thou shalt not dox' rule, and then decide to dox away. Only inbred edomites do that.
A good person doesn't do what Blumfag does either. Inbred edomite.
Oh look! They have something in common with sQuirty.

You act like you're jealous of the attention she got so you do everything to involve yourself in her drama when it had fuck all to do with you.

Bingo. SWMBO was never anything more than a footnote chihuahua that wouldn't stop yapping.

[antiliberalsociety]

It's interesting that @sguevar mentioned sQuirty. She is the best example of someone who deserved to be doxxed, outside of a pedo. She started revealing PMs and trolling PG users w/ numerous alts, from the very beginning. And the Mods of PG did nothing. Then she started doxing people. Pure Cancer. All the while she's sending nudies out to her boiz, i guess that makes her an amateur porn star. That's a pedo red flag.
She claimed to be a victim, red flag.
Married outside her race, red flag.
She said she was a into all kinds of extra-marital kinkies, red flag.
Married a 'youth pastor', that's a big red flag.
Youth pastor of a new age church, another red flag.
Never prosecuted or killed her abuser, she had access and did nothing. Biggest red flag of all.
But those cucked up mods on PG REFUSED to vet her. I begged them. We were all held hostage by that cunt.

I remind you of this because no matter how much that twat deserved every single bit of the fallout from her dox, it should not have happened.
Her doxxers are as evil as she is. imo

A good person doesn't read the 'thou shalt not dox' rule, and then decide to dox away. Only inbred edomites do that.
A good person doesn't do what Blumfag does either. Inbred edomite.
Oh look! They have something in common with sQuirty.

You act like you're jealous of the attention she got so you do everything to involve yourself in her drama when it had fuck all to do with you.

Bingo. SWMBO was never anything more than a footnote chihuahua that wouldn't stop yapping.

Fucking kek

[SearchVoat]

I appreciate the reply and quotations, there is a lot to talk about here so I will try to be as concise as possible.

Likewise. I'll be very brief:

I've been called x and y on those sites, from spic to beaner, to crhistcuck and so on and so forth. But they know that from me because I have willingly gave that information from me. That is also considered personal identifiable information.

I don't think of nationality or ethnicity or faith as necessarily being personally identifying, although the question does raise the issue of "how much information do you need about someone to uniquely identify them?"

No one is calling to his job or even the managers of his social media to shut down his persona, or threatening to have him lose his work.

This has happened, but maybe not directly through voat; "cancel culture".

I'm still contemplating the issue of doxxing and I really appreciate your contribution here. Thank you.

[antiliberalsociety]

I appreciate the reply and quotations, there is a lot to talk about here so I will try to be as concise as possible.

Likewise. I'll be very brief:

I've been called x and y on those sites, from spic to beaner, to crhistcuck and so on and so forth. But they know that from me because I have willingly gave that information from me. That is also considered personal identifiable information.

I don't think of nationality or ethnicity or faith as necessarily being personally identifying, although the question does raise the issue of "how much information do you need about someone to uniquely identify them?"

No one is calling to his job or even the managers of his social media to shut down his persona, or threatening to have him lose his work.

This has happened, but maybe not directly through voat; "cancel culture".

I'm still contemplating the issue of doxxing and I really appreciate your contribution here. Thank you.

By that logic, you support @The_Venerable divulging @fightknightHERO as an Israeli jew because it's not "personally" identifying...