Irish Molecular biologist says vaccinated people may die with subsequent exposure to even common cold

[Deleted User 2149]

Its going to be real awkward when all thats left is us and our overlords. Staring at each other like some showdown in a Clint Eastwood movie.

I think it'll be worse than that: the covid cultists who get the vaxx won't necessarily die, they'll just be more programmed. Getting the vaxx every year will be like an annual software upgrade for NPCs. They'll be programmed by their overlords to make our lives even more miserable.

[Deleted User 4246]

...

[2017Fallout]

I think that is part of the marketing. But if it isn't we may get rid of so many NPCs and celebrities. Like Bill Burr says "they are just clogging up your highway"

[Deleted User 4246]

...

[Deleted User 4246]

...

[Deleted User 4246]

...

[Deleted User 2149]

Jesus Christ. Oh and Anderson Pooper looks more like a clone by the day.

[Lets_talk]

I did some digging; it seems like the issue this lady is pointing out was solved when creating SARS vaccines by leaving out part of the viral spike protein: https://www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8218 (read 'Rogue Responses')

So it shouldn't be a problem with the covid vaccine. Wouldn't it have shown up in the trials if it was, anyway? All it would take would be one patient getting exposed to the virus after vaccination.

Both processes were at play as an unfortunate situation unfolded in the 1960s, according to Graham. Researchers at the time were pursuing a vaccine against RSV, the leading cause of severe respiratory illness in infants. In trials of one vaccine candidate, several children who received the vaccine developed a serious illness when infected with the natural virus.

When SARS, also a coronavirus, appeared in China and spread globally nearly two decades ago, Hotez was among researchers who began investigating a potential vaccine. In early tests of his candidate, he witnessed how immune cells of vaccinated animals attacked lung tissue, in much the same way that the RSV vaccine had resulted in immune cells attacking kids’ lungs. “I thought, ‘Oh crap,’” he recalls, noting his initial fear that a safe vaccine may again not be possible.

But his team revised their approach. Instead of producing the whole spike protein of the virus, they built just a tiny piece of it—the piece that attaches to human cells, called the receptor-binding domain. Subsequent animal tests showed that this strategy did provide the desired protection without the unwanted immune enhancement.

[PeaceSeeker]

I did some digging; it seems like the issue this lady is pointing out was solved when creating SARS vaccines by leaving out part of the viral spike protein: https://www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8218 (read 'Rogue Responses')

So it shouldn't be a problem with the covid vaccine. Wouldn't it have shown up in the trials if it was, anyway? All it would take would be one patient getting exposed to the virus after vaccination.

Both processes were at play as an unfortunate situation unfolded in the 1960s, according to Graham. Researchers at the time were pursuing a vaccine against RSV, the leading cause of severe respiratory illness in infants. In trials of one vaccine candidate, several children who received the vaccine developed a serious illness when infected with the natural virus.

When SARS, also a coronavirus, appeared in China and spread globally nearly two decades ago, Hotez was among researchers who began investigating a potential vaccine. In early tests of his candidate, he witnessed how immune cells of vaccinated animals attacked lung tissue, in much the same way that the RSV vaccine had resulted in immune cells attacking kids’ lungs. “I thought, ‘Oh crap,’” he recalls, noting his initial fear that a safe vaccine may again not be possible.

But his team revised their approach. Instead of producing the whole spike protein of the virus, they built just a tiny piece of it—the piece that attaches to human cells, called the receptor-binding domain. Subsequent animal tests showed that this strategy did provide the desired protection without the unwanted immune enhancement.

It's not clear who you're replying to.

Cytokine storm remains a concern with the mRNA vaccines. I think certain tests were outright skipped also.

[Lets_talk]

@Lets_talk

In your article dated March 2020 cited:

"But immune enhancement concerns linger.

special committee convened by the World Health Organization (WHO) to address immune enhancement, which they refer to as vaccine enhancement. The committee now aims to define what exactly this enhancement means, what the relevant issues are for a COVID-19 vaccine, and what to do with that information, notes Perlman. A subgroup of the committee is expected to produce a summary report within a few months.

The WHO and other health leaders emphasize that it will likely be a year and a half before a vaccine is vetted through trials in animals and humans and ready for dissemination."

No such report is listed on WHO dashboard. If it was going to take a year and a half for a vaccine from March of 2020 why a vaccine in 9 months?? Safety issues have been swept under the rug.

Technical guidance publications (who.int)