Loli becomes a laughing stock

Anything goes.
Deleted User 2149

Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by Deleted User 2149 »

Thisismyaccount
Posts: 2333
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 pm
Topic points (SCP): 3702
Reply points (CCP): 5606

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by Thisismyaccount »

Perhaps it's the beginning of the end of talk.lol. The infighting is getting worse by the day, and the charge is being led by the pedo himself (b4p).
Deleted User 2149

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by Deleted User 2149 »

Thisismyaccount wrote: Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:47 pm Perhaps it's the beginning of the end of talk.lol. The infighting is getting worse by the day, and the charge is being led by the pedo himself (b4p).
If you look at ALS' chart (in chat), you'll see it's been losing traffic for a while.
Pride is a horrible thing. Eventually he'll realise he is dependent on users, not the other way round. But by then it'll be too late.
Thisismyaccount
Posts: 2333
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 pm
Topic points (SCP): 3702
Reply points (CCP): 5606

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by Thisismyaccount »

Can't argue with your assessment CD5. That place is going to become a dumpster fire. :lol:
User avatar
chrimony
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 20
Reply points (CCP): 173

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by chrimony »

Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments

And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.

But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
Deleted User 2149

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by Deleted User 2149 »

chrimony wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments

And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.

But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
Every day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.
User avatar
MrPancake
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 9
Reply points (CCP): 32

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by MrPancake »

CognitiveDissident5 wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 6:59 am
chrimony wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments

And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.

But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
Every day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.
It started with the women. You don't need us any more. You are just as strong and smart and powerful as we are. We did not work ourselves to death for fun; we did it for the women and children, for families. Men simply reacted to what women had become.
Deleted User 2149

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by Deleted User 2149 »

MrPancake wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:02 pm
CognitiveDissident5 wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 6:59 am
chrimony wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments

And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.

But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
Every day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.
It started with the women. You don't need us any more. You are just as strong and smart and powerful as we are. We did not work ourselves to death for fun; we did it for the women and children, for families. Men simply reacted to what women had become.
Oh dear, another one who's fallen for the jew psyop of women hate. Do you understand these are just jew tactics to divide us? I was actually referring to the owner of Loli and the way he treats users ie telling users to kill themselves, fuck themselves, enjoy their bans (for asking reasonable questions or voicing an opposition to paedophilia).
User avatar
MrPancake
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 9
Reply points (CCP): 32

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by MrPancake »

CognitiveDissident5 wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:49 pm
MrPancake wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:02 pm
CognitiveDissident5 wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 6:59 am
Every day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.
It started with the women. You don't need us any more. You are just as strong and smart and powerful as we are. We did not work ourselves to death for fun; we did it for the women and children, for families. Men simply reacted to what women had become.
Oh dear, another one who's fallen for the jew psyop of women hate. Do you understand these are just jew tactics to divide us? I was actually referring to the owner of Loli and the way he treats users ie telling users to kill themselves, fuck themselves, enjoy their bans (for asking reasonable questions or voicing an opposition to paedophilia).
No no; I am aware it is a psyop and a successful one. I was just answering your rhetorical question.
User avatar
antiliberalsociety
Posts: 2633
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
Topic points (SCP): 3394
Reply points (CCP): 4462

Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock

Post by antiliberalsociety »

chrimony wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments

And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.

But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
He refused to adopt the original Voat immune system from the get go. That would rob him of his power. He even abandoned his own plan for warnings and suspensions in lieu of default bans. He's a plebbit faggot through and through.
Post Reply