Loli becomes a laughing stock
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 pm
- Topic points (SCP): 3702
- Reply points (CCP): 5606
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
Perhaps it's the beginning of the end of talk.lol. The infighting is getting worse by the day, and the charge is being led by the pedo himself (b4p).
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
If you look at ALS' chart (in chat), you'll see it's been losing traffic for a while.Thisismyaccount wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:47 pm Perhaps it's the beginning of the end of talk.lol. The infighting is getting worse by the day, and the charge is being led by the pedo himself (b4p).
Pride is a horrible thing. Eventually he'll realise he is dependent on users, not the other way round. But by then it'll be too late.
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 pm
- Topic points (SCP): 3702
- Reply points (CCP): 5606
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
Can't argue with your assessment CD5. That place is going to become a dumpster fire.
- chrimony
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 20
- Reply points (CCP): 173
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments
And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.
But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.
But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
Every day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.chrimony wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments
And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.
But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
- MrPancake
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 9
- Reply points (CCP): 32
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
It started with the women. You don't need us any more. You are just as strong and smart and powerful as we are. We did not work ourselves to death for fun; we did it for the women and children, for families. Men simply reacted to what women had become.CognitiveDissident5 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 6:59 amEvery day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.chrimony wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments
And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.
But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
Oh dear, another one who's fallen for the jew psyop of women hate. Do you understand these are just jew tactics to divide us? I was actually referring to the owner of Loli and the way he treats users ie telling users to kill themselves, fuck themselves, enjoy their bans (for asking reasonable questions or voicing an opposition to paedophilia).MrPancake wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:02 pmIt started with the women. You don't need us any more. You are just as strong and smart and powerful as we are. We did not work ourselves to death for fun; we did it for the women and children, for families. Men simply reacted to what women had become.CognitiveDissident5 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 6:59 amEvery day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.chrimony wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments
And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.
But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.
- MrPancake
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 9
- Reply points (CCP): 32
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
No no; I am aware it is a psyop and a successful one. I was just answering your rhetorical question.CognitiveDissident5 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:49 pmOh dear, another one who's fallen for the jew psyop of women hate. Do you understand these are just jew tactics to divide us? I was actually referring to the owner of Loli and the way he treats users ie telling users to kill themselves, fuck themselves, enjoy their bans (for asking reasonable questions or voicing an opposition to paedophilia).MrPancake wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:02 pmIt started with the women. You don't need us any more. You are just as strong and smart and powerful as we are. We did not work ourselves to death for fun; we did it for the women and children, for families. Men simply reacted to what women had become.CognitiveDissident5 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 6:59 am
Every day I am staggered by the fragility and sensitivity of the male ego. Wtf has happened to our men? A generation ago they were building things, fixing things, raising families. Now they sit online all day with soft pudgy little hands banging their little keyboards in petty butthurt anger over things that don't matter.
- antiliberalsociety
- Posts: 2633
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 3394
- Reply points (CCP): 4462
Re: Loli becomes a laughing stock
He refused to adopt the original Voat immune system from the get go. That would rob him of his power. He even abandoned his own plan for warnings and suspensions in lieu of default bans. He's a plebbit faggot through and through.chrimony wrote: ↑Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:32 am Meh. Blumen had a point, he was spamming: https://www.talk.lol/profile?user=tooba ... w=comments
And AOU has done far worse, and his site still gets traffic from Voat refugees.
But this guy shouldn't have been banned -- a timeout at worst. He went off the rails, but he was a legit user and contributor up until that point. The better solution is not to rely on bannings. If somebody is shitting up the board, downvotes should kick in and throttle automatically. It would take some tuning and time to get it right, but it would alleviate the asshole admin with a twitchy ban finger problem.