Explain how Might is not Right then, that just doesn't cut it. If we were truly superior *somebody* would do *something* right?Tallest_Skil wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 5:27 pmThe one that operates a healthy society after the rest of the species are gone. You know damn well what I mean. We don’t act like them. We’re not them.antiliberalsociety wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 3:53 pm So, your stance is that our superiority is our weakness? What paradigm are you operating under?
White existence is White supremacy
- antiliberalsociety
- Posts: 2633
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 3394
- Reply points (CCP): 4462
Re: White existence is White supremacy
- Tallest_Skil
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 0
- Reply points (CCP): 138
Re: White existence is White supremacy
That’s the goddamned rub, isn’t it. I think our argument hinges on different definitions of the same phrase. White might I define as separate from non-white might. We limit ourselves for the sake of ourselves. They don’t. If not for whites, chemical and biological weapons would be used without regard for anything. The Earth would be a barren wasteland and humanity (if you can call the rest of it thus) would be long gone.antiliberalsociety wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:23 pm Explain how Might is not Right then, that just doesn't cut it. If we were truly superior *somebody* would do *something* right?
I wonder, though. Whether we shouldn’t simply dump off all our chemical weapons on the rest of the world while we still can. By the time we get around to recolonizing it, even their corpses will be gone.
Oh well. Not like we ever will.
- antiliberalsociety
- Posts: 2633
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 3394
- Reply points (CCP): 4462
Re: White existence is White supremacy
We limit ourselves? Or the (((UN))) does? The Geneva Convention was for free nations to be "more civilized". The USSR never signed on, hell even Churchill was pushing to use poison gas.Tallest_Skil wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 4:13 pmThat’s the goddamned rub, isn’t it. I think our argument hinges on different definitions of the same phrase. White might I define as separate from non-white might. We limit ourselves for the sake of ourselves. They don’t. If not for whites, chemical and biological weapons would be used without regard for anything. The Earth would be a barren wasteland and humanity (if you can call the rest of it thus) would be long gone.antiliberalsociety wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:23 pm Explain how Might is not Right then, that just doesn't cut it. If we were truly superior *somebody* would do *something* right?
I wonder, though. Whether we shouldn’t simply dump off all our chemical weapons on the rest of the world while we still can. By the time we get around to recolonizing it, even their corpses will be gone.
Oh well. Not like we ever will.
- Tallest_Skil
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:00 am
- Topic points (SCP): 0
- Reply points (CCP): 138
Re: White existence is White supremacy
Well, it’s all on us now.