SVF Rule Change

[SearchVoat]

There will be an immediate change for the site-wide Terms of Service here:

4. No posting child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors

By way of explanation, I have been acting according to the principle that every human being is deserving of equal respect merely for the fact of being human.

I am now of the view that not every human being deserves that respect. In particular, those who act on their pedophiliac urges do not, in my opinion, deserve that right here. The sins of an active pedophile are far worse than murder, in my opinion.

Therefore I have decided to override the "anything US legal" principle here by excluding active pedophiliac content.

If anyone's interested, it was this post that helped me change my mind.

[antiliberalsociety]

There will be an immediate change for the site-wide Terms of Service here:

4. No posting child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors

By way of explanation, I have been acting according to the principle that every human being is deserving of equal respect merely for the fact of being human.

I am now of the view that not every human being deserves that respect. In particular, those who act on their pedophiliac urges do not, in my opinion, deserve that right here. The sins of an active pedophile are far worse than murder, in my opinion.

Therefore I have decided to override the "anything US legal" principle here by excluding active pedophiliac content.

If anyone's interested, it was this post that helped me change my mind.

Is this to cover up the fact you legitimately said you'd go down with the ship to protect that pedophile's "personal info" and ban anyone repeating what he himself shared?

SearchVoat • Mon Aug 29, 2022 12:46 pm

antiliberalsociety wrote: ↑29 Aug 2022 12:28
And you're willing to go down with the ship over a fucking jew pedophile?

Yes, if that's what happens. But who's sinking the ship?

Inadvertently admitting he is a pedophile in the process?

There's been a lot of activity on chat regarding personal details of a member of this site. I don't care how the information was found, nor how it was disseminated, nor any other circumstance for that matter. It's simply a direct breach of Rule 1.

I don't want to ban everyone in one go!

Stop it.

Or that you disagreed that his pic of underaged nude kids was CP?

Or that you had to attack free speech to hide the fact you just outed yourself as pro pedophile after admitting you were accused of abusing your own two boys?

by SearchVoat » 30 Aug 2022 19:56
Yes I deleted that screenshot for purely selfish reasons. No "rule" basis, nothing to do with doxing. I just don't want it falling into the wrong hands atm. You're perfectly entitled to post it, but I'd ask you as a favour not to. If you do, I'll probably delete it again. Can't justify it other than to say I'm in enough shit already and that post could cause me more.

Even though doxxing has never included repeating information volunteered by said "victim"?

And after doing your bretheren a favor, he deleted his copy of your confession post and ceased all trolling of SearchVoat Forums on talk.loli, where he owns the sub MeanwhileOnSearchVoat?

https://www.talk.lol/viewpost.php?postid=62dd8df939829

And one of our top posters Cognitivedissident5 just nuked her account after donating money to you to keep this place alive, you said that was worth it to you?

[SearchVoat]

And one of our top posters Cognitivedissident5 just nuked her account after donating money to you to keep this place alive, you said that was worth it to you?

THAT makes me very sad indeed. I really wish she hadn't done that.

[antiliberalsociety]

And one of our top posters Cognitivedissident5 just nuked her account after donating money to you to keep this place alive, you said that was worth it to you?

THAT makes me very sad indeed. I really wish she hadn't done that.

I love your cherry picking. You knew this was coming. You stood by it. She spilled a bunch of personal shit to you in PM when you were going to kill yourself trying to support you, but like me she smelled a rat when you promoted the concern troll. Blame no one but yourself.

[thermal_clips]

There will be an immediate change for the site-wide Terms of Service here:

4. No posting child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors

By way of explanation, I have been acting according to the principle that every human being is deserving of equal respect merely for the fact of being human.

I am now of the view that not every human being deserves that respect. In particular, those who act on their pedophiliac urges do not, in my opinion, deserve that right here. The sins of an active pedophile are far worse than murder, in my opinion.

Therefore I have decided to override the "anything US legal" principle here by excluding active pedophiliac content.

If anyone's interested, it was this post that helped me change my mind.

Now get rid of the pedophile. He will only continue to post pedo filth with new attempts to justify it. Save yourself the game of pedo whack a mole. Get rid of blumen the pedophile.

[antiliberalsociety]

There will be an immediate change for the site-wide Terms of Service here:

4. No posting child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors

By way of explanation, I have been acting according to the principle that every human being is deserving of equal respect merely for the fact of being human.

I am now of the view that not every human being deserves that respect. In particular, those who act on their pedophiliac urges do not, in my opinion, deserve that right here. The sins of an active pedophile are far worse than murder, in my opinion.

Therefore I have decided to override the "anything US legal" principle here by excluding active pedophiliac content.

If anyone's interested, it was this post that helped me change my mind.

Now get rid of the pedophile. He will only continue to post pedo filth with new attempts to justify it. Save yourself the game of pedo whack a mole. Get rid of blumen the pedophile.

He wouldn't shoah one of his bretheren. Check the chat, he's more inclined to ban his adversaries.

Save this before his pedo buddy deletes

Ok final warning. Post that, or identify the guy once more, and you're banned.

The pic in question had zero identifying features to it. Not even a username.

[SearchVoat]

I should add that this issue isn't entirely resolved. The rule change just moves the goalposts. It might solve one problem but immediately raises two more:

1. If pedophilia is a special case, why not XXX?

2. What counts as "sexually suggestive"? I know it when I see it?

[antiliberalsociety]

I should add that this issue isn't entirely resolved. The rule change just moves the goalposts. It might solve one problem but immediately raises two more:

1. If pedophilia is a special case, why not XXX?

2. What counts as "sexually suggestive"? I know it when I see it?

Keep ignoring my points, it's really helping your cause.

[kestrel9]

I should add that this issue isn't entirely resolved. The rule change just moves the goalposts. It might solve one problem but immediately raises two more:

1. If pedophilia is a special case, why not XXX?

2. What counts as "sexually suggestive"? I know it when I see it?

4. No posting child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors

It's not rocket science.

[SearchVoat]

4. No posting child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors
It's not rocket science.

Are pictures of my niece at her preschool graduation sexually suggestive? They might be, if you're perverted enough.