"You are are a favorite poster. Just please make succinct tiles, so other users won't report you because don't understand the confusing topic. You are welcome to post here always. I know your work and a fan."

1. When I search for a user's comments it can only display a maximum of 9 pages (250 comments), even though there are still hundreds more according the total found count. Bug?
   
   .
2. I am searching for comments for a particular anon user on v/QRV. He tends to consistantly use unique characters strings in his comments like ~ and .... and /// which make him easily identifiable.
   However, the search function just appears to interpret these as an empty string. Could there be a feature to search comments for string literals? Eg. "~" and "...." ?

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:09 am When I search for a user's comments and select "Order by: oldest first", it only displays a maximum of 9 pages. Is this intentional or a bug?

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:09 am I am searching for comments for a particular anon user on v/QRV. He tends to consistantly use unique characters strings in his comments like ~ and .... and /// which make him easily identifiable.
However, the search function just appears to interpret these as an empty string. Could there be a feature to search comments for string literals? Eg. "~" and "...." ?

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:37 am

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:09 am When I search for a user's comments and select "Order by: oldest first", it only displays a maximum of 9 pages. Is this intentional or a bug?

Yes it's limited to 10 pages (0 to 9).

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:43 am I was wrong, this is true for ANY comment search. I am surprised, this is extremely limiting. It also makes the "[total] Found" count at the bottom deceptive to the user.

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:43 am If I can't browse a users whole comment history, then is there a way to at least export/download it?

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:51 am

No, you can only download (to csv or json) 240 records at a time - i.e. 10 pages x 24 rows.

$cl->SetLimits(0, 25, 250);
$cl->SetLimits(25, 25, 250);
$cl->SetLimits(50, 25, 250);

etc.

$cl->SetLimits(0, 25);
$cl->SetLimits(25, 25);
$cl->SetLimits(50, 25);

etc.

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:55 am Seems like an easy fix.

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:59 am

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:55 am Seems like an easy fix.

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

SearchVoat wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:37 am

aekotra2 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:09 am I am searching for comments for a particular anon user on v/QRV. He tends to consistantly use unique characters strings in his comments like ~ and .... and /// which make him easily identifiable.
However, the search function just appears to interpret these as an empty string. Could there be a feature to search comments for string literals? Eg. "~" and "...." ?

Sadly no. The search is powered by Sphinx https://sphinxsearch.com/ and it can only index alphanumeric characters.

Marcion preached that the benevolent God of the Gospel who sent Jesus Christ into the world as the savior was the true Supreme Being, different and opposed to the malevolent Demiurge or creator god, identified with the Hebrew God of the Old Testament. He considered himself a follower of Paul the Apostle, whom he believed to have been the only true apostle of Jesus Christ.

Early Church writers such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian denounced Marcion as a heretic or antichrist, and he was excommunicated by the church of Rome around 144. He published his own canon of Christian sacred scriptures, which contained ten Pauline epistles (including the Epistle to the Laodiceans, while excluding the Pastoral epistles) and the Gospel of Marcion which historically is claimed to be an edited version of the Gospel of Luke.

There are no records or even historical records of this trial except the outcome of Paul's release. So below we re-enact the likely issues of that first trial with what we believe are likely and plausible details.

He was with Paul in Jerusalem, and the Jews, supposing that the apostle had brought him into the temple, raised a tumult which resulted in Paul's imprisonment.

Trophimus is also mentioned in 2 Timothy 4:20: "Trophimus I left at Miletus sick."

FeathersMcGraw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 5:41 pm Interesting, although in Del Tondo's account Caesar says "to make sure you understand your responsibility for his death, it is you who must perform the execution of Trophimus at the sixth hour of today." But I don't think there's any supporting scripture for that, is there? That would be truly damning.

Do you think that Paul was consciously trying to create his own cult, piggy-backing on Jesus? Or what do you think his motivation was?

Introduction
Acts 21:26-31 records the account of Paul's arrest for ostensibly bringing a Gentile into the temple. In the account, the "Jews from Asia " (modern Turkey ) were obviously well aware of what Paul had been teaching in Asia . Ephesus was a prominent city of Asia . When Paul was in the temple providing the animal sacrifices for the purification rites of four Nazirites at James's behest to ostensibly prove to everyone that he still kept the law of Moses, these Asian Jews spotted Paul and leveled the following accusation against him.
"Men of Israel , help! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against the people, the law, and this place, and furthermore he also brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled this holy place."
Immediately after this in verse 29, Luke makes this interesting quasi-defense for Paul.
“For they had seen Trophimus the Ephesian with him in the city, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple.”
This argument as it stands would have an impossible time holding up in court. It would be absurd to suggest that simply having seen Paul with a Gentile in the city would have been grounds on which to convict him of actually bringing that Gentile into the temple. No one would make that argument. Jews and Gentiles mingled outside the temple all the time. It should be apparent that there must be more to the story here …and probably something that Luke would really rather not reveal to us. Therefore, we are forced to read between the lines and logically put the missing pieces of the puzzle together.
Now if Trophimus had gone into the temple and been caught, and Paul was responsible for putting it in his mind to go there on his own, then we have a different story.


First: Trophimus was caught in the temple

It is evident that Trophimus had indeed been caught in the temple. Here is the flow of logic:
The Jews of Asia could not have been referring to the Nazirites with Paul in the temple at that time as "Greeks". (No Jew would have confused a Nazirite for a Gentile.)
If no Gentile had been in the temple at all, it would have been Paul’s and Luke's first and only-necessary line of defense!
If no Gentile had been in the temple, James most certainly would have come to Paul’s rescue and reassured the “many myriads of Jews” which he led that such was the case. Therefore:
Some Gentile had obviously defiled the temple.
The fact that Luke is compelled to mention Trophimus by name is telling. Obviously, he was the one being prosecuted for being in the temple. If Trophimus had not been the one who everyone was already talking about, there would have been no need for Luke to name him and bring him into it.
Luke only tries to put distance from the idea that Paul had physically ushered Trophimus into the temple by saying they only "supposed” it.
The Jews of Asia knew that Paul was responsible for Trophimus defiling the temple. Some of them, having seen Trophimus and Paul together in the city would have naturally jumped to the conclusion that Paul had actually accompanied Trophimus into the temple. Thus the rumor began. Luke seized upon the error and tried to cover for Paul by saying, “they supposed that Paul had brought” Trophimus into the temple. But the Asian Jews were none the less correct in accusing Paul of being responsible for Trophimus defiling the temple.


Second: Paul was responsible for Trophimus being in the temple

That Trophimus was an Ephesian and a friend of Paul is not in question. How Trophimus came to believe he had some right to enter the temple on his own accord is what tells the rest of the story. It could hardly be more obvious where Trophimus got his presumptuous idea in light of what we know Paul had been teaching the Ephesians. In his epistle to the Ephesians Paul had written these words:
“Therefore remember that you, once Gentiles in the flesh--who are called Uncircumcision by what is called the Circumcision made in the flesh by hands--that at that time you were without Christ, being aliens form the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been made near by the blood of Christ. For he himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of division 1 between us, having abolished in his flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in himself one new man form the two, thus making peace, and that he might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity. And he came and preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near. For through him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father. Now, Therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, 2 having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief cornerstone in whom the whole building, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit.”
Ephesians 2:11-22

1 "the middle wall of division" is a direct reference to the wall in the temple that separated the court of the Gentiles from the court of Israel.
2 "members of the household of God" is an indisputable reference to those who have the right to worship in the temple.

Thus Trophimus boldly went where no Gentile was supposed to go! When he was caught and interrogated, his immediate defense would naturally have been along the lines of:

“…but Paul said there is no difference between Jew and Gentile anymore! He said the wall of division in the temple is meaningless. He said I now have access to the Father and am a fellow citizen and an equal member with you in the household of God!”
Now try to imagine how that defense would have gone over with the priests!

This scenario would perfectly explain several things:

It explains why Paul was held responsible for a Gentile being in the temple ...even though he may not have physically ushered him in.
It explains the subsequent uproar in all of Jerusalem against Paul.
It also perfectly explains why James never did come to Paul’s rescue after this.

Prior to this, James had confronted Paul concerning the anti-Moses rumors that were going around about him and effectively made it known to Paul that they had better not be true. James was the one who had sent Paul to the temple in the first place, for the very purpose of giving him opportunity to prove that the rumors were not true and that he continued to abide by the Law. (see Acts 21:18-25) James could have easily calmed the crowd by explaining everything and assuring the people that Paul had not brought a Gentile into the temple if that were the case and it was all a simple misunderstanding. But that wasn't the case. After Trophimus defiled the temple and tried to defend himself with Paul's doctrine, it was all over for Paul. The Jews from Asia testified that Paul had indeed been teaching such things, and quite possibly documented the fact with a copy of Paul's letter to the Ephesians. After this, James could not defend Paul any longer. There was no question anymore. The rumors were true. Paul had in fact been teaching “…against the people, the Law, and this place…”!

Dear Paul,

First of all, thank you for writing so much of the New Testament.

Thank you for also teaching inerrancy, not only of the Bible you have (the Old Testament) but of your own letters and those other parts of the New Testament that hadn’t even been written yet!

The actual reason for my letter is to ask you to clear up some confusion for me. I’m reading through Romans, and I see that you quote the Old Testament on pretty much every page.

[Which, by the way, is another thing I appreciate that about your work: you show that the entire Bible is exactly on the same page, that the Old Testament writers were already writing about the coming of Jesus. And you quote chapter and verse to prove it.]

But, getting to my question–and if this is a minor point or I’m missing something, please feel free to ignore–I’m having some trouble with a few places where you quote the Old Testament.

Now, I know you believe, as we all do, that the Bible, being God’s word, is perfectly consistent all the way through, meaning it doesn’t mean one thing in the Old Testament and another thing when you quote it. You respect the Bible and the intention of the original author more than anyone, and you’d never mistreat the Bible like that.

But I’m reading along, a little more than halfway through (we call it Romans 9:25-26), where you are making your point about how God has called a people not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles.

Then you quote from Hosea 2:23 and 1:10 to show that this whole business of including the Gentiles was on God’s mind all along.

- Those who are not my people I will call “my people,” and her who was not beloved I will call “beloved.”

- And in the very place where it was said to them, “you are not my people,” there they shall be called children of the living God.

It looks like you’re saying “those who are not my people…not beloved” are the Gentiles who are now included because of Jesus. I’m happy for Gentile inclusion, being one myself, but I went back and read Hosea and I’m confused.

It seems pretty clear to me that the original meaning and intention of Hosea is that God is restoring disobedient Israel after a period of rejection and punishment. I’m not seeing anything there at all about Gentiles, and so I’m not sure why you would say “here are two verses about Gentile inclusion.”

I have some Christian friends who think that, because you’re Jewish, you might actually be engaging in a little creative Jewish midrash here, but I’ve told them that you would never play fast and loose with scripture! You understand that the very doctrine of inerrancy that you teach–maybe even the gospel that you preach–hangs in the balance.

I think you see my confusion, though.

So I’m asking you to help me defend you better. Perhaps point me to other places in your letters where you don’t do this sort of thing, which would really help in balance things out.

Or maybe slowly and clearly explain how your use of Hosea’s words is aligned with what God actually intended, and why it’s OK for God to intend something Hosea doesn’t when it’s not OK for us to do that.

I have to say, too, this lingering uneasy feeling has been growing since I began Romans. Please help me see better what I know you’re actually doing.

Sincerely,

Your Fellow Soldier

P.S. If you have some time, could you also clear up why you’re not a strong supporter of the “eternal covenant” of circumcision God gave Abraham and why all of a sudden the list of clean and unclean foods God gave Moses on Mt. Sinai is optional. Only if you have time.

Saint Paul says that he is of the tribe of Benjamin and a Hebrew of Hebrews (Phil 3:5). In my book The Catholic Perspective on Paul (2010), I assembled a historical biography of Saint Paul and showed how his life informed his theology. Since then, I have been trying to fit another piece of the Paul puzzle – Paul’s relation to Herod.

1. Saul/Paul was highly educated both in Hebrew Scripture/Tradition but also in Greek philosophy.
2. Saul/Paul was a Roman citizen.
3. Saul/Paul officially persecuted Christians on behalf of the Temple authorities.
4. Saul/Paul is grouped with those raised with Herod Antipas the Tetrarch.
5. Saulus/Paulus was not merely a plebian rabbi. He had political clout.
6. Josephus refers to a “Saulus” who persecuted people in Jerusalem.
7. Paul identifies his Herodian kinfolk.
The fact that Saul/Paul was a Pharisee does not disqualify him from being a Herodian. Rather, it substantiates it.

https://reclaimthenet.org/the-uks-onlin ... ct-is-here

https://rumble.com/v5emo1m-jfk-assassin ... -of-j.html

https://odysee.com/@Johnny_Cirucci:4/Th ... -Cirucci:2

https://www.bitchute.com/video/STCH1mP7l53g/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gfyTc4UVoHvq/

https://odysee.com/@SkyDomeAtlantis:4/t ... 31C66100:0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JYEIZDm4U32H/

Within the Trump Administration, Alexander advocated for a strategy of mass infection of the public with COVID-19 to build herd immunity. He sought to muzzle federal scientists and public health agencies to prevent them from contradicting the Trump Administration's political talking points.

and you Sherri Nelson, Sherri ‘bones’ Nelson, aka ‘Polly’, I heard you slandered me in media, you freak, you corrupted banal freak, I heard major media exposure is coming for you soon to inform who you really are and your husband and his ties, you typical money whore liar, talking smack about me? like you could ever do what I did?

you Sherri Nelson…do not worry Sherri Nelson, as the truth of you is laid bare, I heard many are coming at you to show the fraud you are…I will help amplify it, you sorry thief. You and that other Vandersteel crook, I heard she has lots of answering for money she cannot account for…

come at me….I can play your game just like you. you people are nothing but frauds leeching on pained people, living off people.

I heard you asking behind the scenes Sherri if TWC can make you an affiliate….a birdie told me you asked if you can speak to Foster Coulson for a job…I heard this, is this so? if all this anger is because you want a job, why did you not say so? I even heard you get a monthly stipend from Malone to attack and smear everyone who he sued and asked him questions…I heard that’s how you get by today…you have your head up Malone’s ass….is this so too Sherri? Figures….nothing but a fraud…seems so, so that may be right…why can’t you work for a living like everyone else?

next time you wish to opine about me, go check my background, go see who I am and what I did…I ain’t low-life basement dwelling you…Randy H told us you are a bit deranged and off the rocker, a bit unbalanced and on the edge…he was right.

I saw a communication today by these 4 doctors to TWC threatening TWC and the owner basically extorting, that if they do not agree to pay them off, they will smear him and use people like that freak Amazing Polly (Sherri ‘Bones’ Nelson who has been wrongfully disgustingly with no basis attacking TWC)….no I am not doxing you, you freak Polly, you wrote about me, me, in media, recall…I did not forget you…when it was I who started the Freedom Fighter movment in Canada while you pulled fuzz from your navel…stood with the Canadian truckers, US truckers, went into every government to get them help on mandates while you fondled in your basement…you and your conflicted husband in Canadian government who works in Calain group…transhumanism shit. Do not get me started Amazing Polly…
see Sherri Polly, I am an animal when you interfere with me…Malone knows it, go ask him…

https://files.catbox.moe/pouh3z.png

doginventer wrote: ↑Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:56 pm Oh wow! I guess we shouldn’t be noticing these guys after all.

doginventer wrote: ↑Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:56 pm And one less journalist, that’s a relief.

shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:49 am

https://files.catbox.moe/pouh3z.png

https://files.catbox.moe/pouh3z.png

doginventer wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:37 am

From the Calian Website:
“Calian develops and delivers large-scale, multi-agency exercises for miliary, public safety and utilities operators. We have delivered disinformation components for military exercises, for domestic major event security and for nuclear power generation exercises ranging from coordinated campaigns across all media channels to limited disinformation activities on key issues. Exercising the information domain provides a highly realistic simulation of the contemporary information space for exercise participants.”

"Media Matters" redirects here.
Media Matters for America (MMfA) is a non-profit left-leaning watchdog journalism organization. It was founded in 2004 by journalist and political activist David Brock as a counterweight to the conservative Media Research Center. It seeks to spotlight "conservative misinformation" in the U.S. media; its methods include issuing reports and quick responses. Two example initiatives include the "Drop Fox" campaign (2011–2013) that sought to discredit Fox News' "fair and balanced" claims; and a 2023 report about X (formerly Twitter) that highlighted antisemitism on the platform.

Sherri Nelson has many different online handles, personas and personalities and many different looks and styles. We’ve known her as “Amazing Polly”, someone who has done valuable research into the many moving parts of the World Economic Forum and the Great Reset. I have been a big fan and promoter of the work of “Amazing Polly” over the past 5 years, so what I’m seeing now is disturbing on many levels. I hope that she is safe.

“Polly Phemus” and “Fight Narcissism” were two screen names used by Sherri Nelson around 2014-2016, when she was blogging about Narcissistic Personality Disorder, as documented on clusterbfreezone1175’s YouTube channel and in her blog, FinallyFreeFromNarcissism. clusterbfreezone1175 is an American woman who, in 2017 was finally forced to hire a lawyer in Canada to serve Sherri and her husband with a Cease and Desist order for prolonged online harassment that lasted for over a year.

These video clips were filmed around 2015 and they were assembled in 2017 by clusterbfreezone1175 on YouTube. I’ve heard Sherri Nelson has taken acting lessons but this performance is incredible. In this video, Sherri is completely in character, with such full immersion in the role, that one could almost be forgiven for suspecting that she’s a victim of MK ULTRA programming.

Watching this reminds me of what Cathy O’Brien described in her book, ‘TRANCEformation of America’ as part of her programming. Not only were multiple personalities created like digital files through the use of systemic trauma, but Cathy recounts being trained with other women in “glamour” at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma; in the control of the micro muscles in the face to subtly alter the shape of her features.

Look at how Sherri’s features morph into those of a wide-eyed, innocent child, as she complains about “Polly Phemus”, which was one of Sherri’s other screen names.

Sherri’s “Little Girl” persona complains about “Polly Phemus”, as if the screen name were an actual, separate human being, complaining that Polly Phemus is “making fun of me”.

I’m not certain if this “Little Girl” persona is pretending to be her victim (clusterbfreezone1175) and is thereby taunting her or if what we’re looking at is full blown Dissociative Identity Disorder. The former means Sherri is conscious and sadistic, the latter means Sherri has no agency. The more I watch this, the more I tend toward the former. What do you think?

shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:19 am

viewtopic.php?t=14276

doginventer wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:58 am

shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:19 am ftfy

shewhomustbeobeyed wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 12:16 pm

doginventer wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:58 am

I was trying to help, why be so cryptic? Just say what you want me to know.

doginventer wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 6:19 pm You are sliding information about the massively powerful and influential players to focus forensically on little fish.

But if it wasn't for you, I wouldn't have dug half as deep.

https://odysee.com/@PollyStGeorge:3/Eps ... -Network:c

https://www.brighteon.com/5d38e0c7-c743 ... 5b5e26a486

https://www.bitchute.com/video/srSvVtad0xRe/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uUAAfBXc0AnP/

https://odysee.com/@SJWellFire:a/413Wic ... vergence:4

https://rumble.com/v6rklb3-is-trump-an- ... ript..html

https://www.brighteon.com/364c9da6-343e ... 1fe00f4561

https://www.brighteon.com/577cdbae-c48f ... 85b44ee4e0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vwwiGv3GzlaJ/